bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | Cambridge, MA | |
age | 25 | |
visits | member for | 4 years |
seen | May 16 at 17:54 | |
stats | profile views | 1,333 |
I'm interested in topology, algebraic geometry and number theory.
Jul 2 |
awarded | Curious |
Jun 26 |
awarded | Yearling |
May 15 |
awarded | Nice Question |
May 14 |
comment |
What is the coefficient ring of algebraic K theory of the discrete $\mathbb{C}$?
There are probably no modifications necessary in this case - thanks. And I'm interested in the torsion-free part, so fine with taking coefficients in any characteristic-zero field. Edited question accordingly. |
May 14 |
revised |
What is the coefficient ring of algebraic K theory of the discrete $\mathbb{C}$?
removed some parentheticals, added that only interested in torsion-free part |
May 13 |
asked | What is the coefficient ring of algebraic K theory of the discrete $\mathbb{C}$? |
Jun 26 |
awarded | Yearling |
May 10 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Apr 29 |
asked | A nice rigid analytic model for local systems over an elliptic curve? |
Apr 24 |
comment |
What is a higher derived constructible sheaf
@David So it sounds like you're saying (in the algebraic case), that the 'etale topos contains all the topology of a manifold up to some sort of profinite completion, and higher-category analogues of locally constant (resp. constructible) sheaves are well-approximated by sheaves on this topos on the one hand, and therefore by D-modules on the other hand. Is this correct? |
Apr 23 |
accepted | What is a higher derived constructible sheaf |
Apr 23 |
comment |
What is a higher derived constructible sheaf
Thanks! This is great. Looking at Aaron Smith's website, I saw he's working on a paper with Block on a constructible Riemann-Hilbert correspondence. |
Apr 23 |
revised |
What is a higher derived constructible sheaf
minor edits + added local-systems tag |
Apr 23 |
asked | What is a higher derived constructible sheaf |
Apr 16 |
answered | Algebraic machinery for algebraic geometry |
Apr 13 |
comment |
Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows
Thank you! I looked at the paper. In terms of its notation, are you saying that the horizontal section is the 1-eigenspace of the derivative of the fundamental endomorphism? |
Apr 13 |
comment |
Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows
Thanks! Yes, this is exactly what I need. Do you have a link for Foulon's thesis? |
Apr 13 |
accepted | Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows |
Apr 12 |
asked | Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows |
Apr 12 |
answered | Description of the units of the group ring Fp[Fp] ? |