Bruno
|
Registered User
|
|
|
May 12 |
comment |
Is there an algebraic curve over Q which is not modular? Ah, thank you David |
|
May 11 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
May 11 |
comment |
Is there an algebraic curve over Q which is not modular? Dear David: thank you, that is very interesting. I will try to wrap my head around it. Why does the representation afforded by $H^1$ land inside the sympectic group? Is this a consequence of some kind of $\mathcal l$-adic Riemann relations? (Forgive me, I know next to nothing about $\mathcal l$-adic cohomology.) |
|
May 11 |
asked | Is there an algebraic curve over Q which is not modular? |
|
May 3 |
comment |
Where do the product expansions of modular forms come from? Dear @Steve: that's true, but I don't think the above products are directly related to the Euler products (they're products over $n$, rather than over $p$). Different animals! I may be wrong, though. Regards, |
|
May 3 |
asked | Where do the product expansions of modular forms come from? |
|
Apr 27 |
comment |
A divergent series related to the number of divisors of of p-1 Thank you, Nilotpal. |
|
Apr 27 |
comment |
A divergent series related to the number of divisors of of p-1 Interesting, @Greg - thanks for sharing. |
|
Apr 27 |
answered | A divergent series related to the number of divisors of of p-1 |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
A divergent series related to the number of divisors of of p-1 Cool! Thanks zeb! |
|
Apr 25 |
asked | A divergent series related to the number of divisors of of p-1 |
|
Apr 9 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
Apr 9 |
comment |
Elliptic curve over a scheme is a group scheme? Dear anon, would you mind expanding a little bit? Thank you! |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Elliptic curve over a scheme is a group scheme? Thank you very much Joël! |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Elliptic curve over a scheme is a group scheme? Thank you Timo! |
|
Apr 8 |
asked | Elliptic curve over a scheme is a group scheme? |
|
Mar 22 |
comment |
Is the primitive element theorem a cohomological statement? @Martin, I also have not completely given up on the idea. If you think of anything, please share! Regards, |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Is the primitive element theorem a cohomological statement? That's a good point! |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Is the primitive element theorem a cohomological statement? This is the sort of thing that I have in mind: For a Dedekind domain $A$, every projective $A$-module is free if and only if $\text{Pic}(A) = H^1(X, \mathcal O_X^*) = 0$ (where $X=\text{Spec }A$). |
|
Mar 21 |
asked | Is the primitive element theorem a cohomological statement? |
|
Dec 27 |
awarded | ● Popular Question |
