bio | website | dm.unipi.it/~martelli |
---|---|---|
location | Pisa (Italy) | |
age | 42 | |
visits | member for | 5 years |
seen | 15 hours ago | |
stats | profile views | 3,477 |
Associate professor in geometry (Pisa, Italy)
May 20 |
awarded | Yearling |
Apr 13 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Apr 7 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Feb 5 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Jan 23 |
comment |
Fox re-imbedding theorem in dimension four
More generally, which re-imbedding techniques do we know? If I have a 3-manifold in S^4, how can I modify its embedding so that it is not isotopic to the previous one? |
Dec 9 |
revised |
Does there always exist a sequence of handle moves between handle decompositions that does not increase index? (+ ref. request)
added 3 characters in body |
Dec 9 |
revised |
Does there always exist a sequence of handle moves between handle decompositions that does not increase index? (+ ref. request)
fix |
Dec 9 |
answered | Does there always exist a sequence of handle moves between handle decompositions that does not increase index? (+ ref. request) |
Dec 3 |
comment |
Can knot diagrams be monotonically simplified using under moves?
As suggested by Marco, this knot can be fully simplified via level moves, see zanellati.it/knot/Satellite_knot.pdf I just got this information from the author of the program who is following this page, so drawings of more complicated unknots are welcome :-) It would be interesting to try one more additional doubling as suggested by Joel... |
Nov 28 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Nov 24 |
answered | Additivity of simplicial volume |
Nov 4 |
comment |
Examples of Einstein four-manifolds of negative sectional curvature
using Dehn filling on cusped hyperbolic manifolds (see the papers of Anderson and Bamler) you can construct plenty of manifolds that admit both Einstein and non-positive sectional curvature metrics, but not simultaneously as far as I understand. |
Nov 4 |
comment |
Can knot diagrams be monotonically simplified using under moves?
I don't know (I still haven't seen the program running), but if you perform the diagram connected sum I suppose it simplifies the knot exactly as before. One should try some hard version of the trefoil knot... |
Nov 4 |
revised |
Can knot diagrams be monotonically simplified using under moves?
picture |
Nov 4 |
answered | Can knot diagrams be monotonically simplified using under moves? |
Oct 10 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Sep 30 |
awarded | Explainer |
Aug 28 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Aug 25 |
comment |
Is a generic closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold Haken?
are we sure that any configuration of tetrahedra appears with probability one? This does not hold for graphs (some graphs almost never appear as subgraphs of a random 4-valent graph). |
Aug 24 |
comment |
Is a generic closed orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold Haken?
I see, if you fix the genus g then every manifold has Betti number at most g and a generic splitting has transverse lagrangians, hence it is a rational homology sphere. It would be nice to understand if a random manifold is Haken with this model. |