Reputation
Top tag
dg.differentialgeometry
2d

comment 
Darbouxlike coordinates on a Kähler manifold
Generally speaking, it's the complex structure that's most important to keep track of easily. So the most common coordinates used in calculations are holomorphic coordinates $z^1, \dots, z^n, \bar{z}^1, \dots, \bar{z}^n$, and the Kähler metric is represented using its potential function. Normal coordinates are more useful in real Riemannian geometry, because they are connected to Jacobi fields. I can imagine that in some circumstances Darboux coordinates are useful. Another alternative is to use a unitary frame of $(1,0)$forms and not coordinates. Try all of them and see which works best. 
Feb
5 
comment 
No normal coordinates on general Finsler manifolds
So there are $C^1$ normal coordinates? 
Feb
5 
comment 
No normal coordinates on general Finsler manifolds
Could you provide what the definition of "normal coordinates" would be for a Finsler manifold? 
Feb
5 
comment 
Is the FlajoletMartin constant irrational? Is it transcendental?
Jeff is an oldfashioned guy. It also follows the tradition of Donald Knuth. 
Jan
31 
comment 
Is there a Nashtype theorem for symplectic manifolds?
Isn't $\omega$ being exact a necessary condition for the existence of an embedding? 
Jan
31 
comment 
geodesic computation: “energy” minimization versus arc length minimization
That sounds reasonable, but what does that have to do with the energy functional? It is indeed straightforward to write down the ODE satisfied by a geodesic parameterized by one of the coordinates, and indeed the ODE is not the EulerLagrange equation of the energy functional. That's not surprising since the energy functional is not invariant under changes of parameterization (in contrast to the length functional). 
Jan
30 
comment 
geodesic computation: “energy” minimization versus arc length minimization
Why would you want to restrict the parameter like that? 
Jan
30 
comment 
geodesic computation: “energy” minimization versus arc length minimization
You should move this question to math.stackexchange.com. A parameterized curve in a Riemannian manifold that is a critical point of the energy functional is always a geodesic parameterized by a constant times arclength. 
Jan
26 
awarded  Announcer 
Jan
26 
comment 
Canonical Metric on Grassmann Manifold
To repeat what Sebastian already said, the question refers to Grassmannians, which most of us would interpret as real Grassmannians, i.e., $G(n,k) = $ the space of $k$linear subspaces in an $n$dimensional real vector space. In general there is no complex structure on such a space, for example if the Grassmannian is odddimensional. However, it is a homogeneous space, and the standard meaning of a "canonical metric" on a homogeneous space is one that is invariant under the group action. 
Jan
25 
comment 
Obtaining Hessian of the embedding from an induced metric
A simple example is $z = x^2$. The induced metric is the standard flat one, also induced by $z=0$, but the two embeddings have different Hessians. 
Jan
22 
comment 
Does a Riemannian manifold have a triangulation with quantitative bounds?
If you can read German, the original paper is: here: link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01168235 
Jan
22 
comment 
Does a Riemannian manifold have a triangulation with quantitative bounds?
Could the almostlinear coordinates introduced by Jost and Karcher provide a means to proving this? You can find an English explanation of these coordinates in the following lecture notes: Jost, Jürgen Harmonic mappings between Riemannian manifolds. Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis, Australian National University, 4. (I might be able to find my copy of it, if you think this would be useful) 
Jan
20 
comment 
Upper bound for Willmore energy
It suffices to compute or estimate the Willmore energy for an explicit embedding of the surface. I imagine there are a number of ways to do this. One possible approach for a surface of genus $g$ is to embed $g$ copies of the torus explicitly and glue them together by removing small disks and attaching a small cylinder that flattens out at both ends. The total Willmore functional of the surface is roughly equal to the sum of the Willmore functionals of the $g$ tori and $g1$ cylinders. These can be estimated using the explicit formulas defining them. 
Jan
16 
comment 
An example for affine function
What does "affine function" mean in this context? 
Jan
13 
comment 
Conformally flat manifold with zero scalar
"Conformally flat" = "locally conformally flat". 
Jan
13 
comment 
Conformally flat manifold with zero scalar
In dimensions 4 or higher, conformally flat means the Weyl tensor vanishes. If the scalar curvature also vanishes, there is still the possibility that the tracefree part of the Ricci curvature is nonvanishing. As Robert points out, there are indeed local metrics satisfying this. 
Jan
11 
comment 
Concentration compactness on a compact setting
The usual case is when the sequence is a minimizing sequence for an energy associated with a critical Sobolev inequality. One then analyzes the limiting situation via a blowup argument (rescaling the manifold near a point where the sequence is converging weakly to a point measure). 
Jan
11 
comment 
Completion of $C_{0,rad}^{\infty}(\Omega)$ with respect to the norm $\u\= \Bigg(\int_{\Omega} \Delta u ^2 \, \mathrm{d}x \Bigg)^{\frac{1}{2}}. $
Thomas's remark, along with the definitions of the two spaces you're trying to decide between, immediately gives the answer. This is more appropriate for math.stackexchange.com 
Jan
10 
awarded  Notable Question 