bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 4 years, 8 months |
seen | Jan 3 at 9:16 | |
stats | profile views | 3,358 |
I'm interested in many things, but algebraic geometry I love.
Oct 4 |
comment |
Why is there no “regular etale fundamental group”?
unknown, it sounds like you have an example in mind. |
Oct 4 |
asked | Why is there no “regular etale fundamental group”? |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Favorite Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Great Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Famous Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Good Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Notable Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Sep 8 |
accepted | Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture |
Sep 7 |
awarded | Mortarboard |
Sep 7 |
comment |
Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture
David, your comments are precisely the type of answer I'm looking for. It is okay that it's 20 years old. |
Sep 7 |
comment |
Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture
You are correct that I was inaccurate on that point, although I did know that it was Weil's idea. As for you argument for patience, I think you have misunderstood my question. I am not asking for a sketch of the methods, but only what those methods aim to achieve. An example of a good answer is David Speyer's comments. So saying "here is the rough argument in the function fields case, and so what we want is a number theoretic analogue of ____" is precisely the answer I was looking for. |
Sep 7 |
comment |
Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture
@quid: you're being stubborn. Is it not legitimate to ask questions about mathematics that is available but difficult to read and understand? @Kevin: thanks! |
Sep 7 |
revised |
Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture
deleted 4 characters in body; deleted 21 characters in body |
Sep 7 |
comment |
Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture
@quid: the expositions I've seen (such as kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/2010-10-abstract.pdf) are mostly teasers to make people read more. My question is about the sketch underlying the proof of the ABC conjecture, which I don't see evident there. If you have an exposition that you would recommend, I suggest that you write it as an answer. |
Sep 7 |
comment |
Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture
Correction: "an enthusiastic report". Sorry, Jordan! |
Sep 7 |
asked | Philosophy behind Mochizuki's work on the ABC conjecture |
Aug 29 |
awarded | Popular Question |