Reputation
4,954
Next privilege 5,000 Rep.
Approve tag wiki edits
Badges
1 18 35
Newest
 Yearling
Impact
~83k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 579 votes cast
Oct
24
comment Slick ways to make annoying verifications
@Charles : yes, sorry, I forgot to say "free", so the modules should be free of the same rank. Thanks.
Oct
23
answered Slick ways to make annoying verifications
Oct
23
comment Slick ways to make annoying verifications
And the closed graph criteria also works in a compact space!
Oct
21
awarded  Nice Answer
Oct
21
answered Lost soul: loneliness in pursing math. Advice needed.
Oct
5
answered The significance of modularity for all Galois representations
Sep
30
awarded  Enlightened
Sep
30
awarded  Nice Answer
Sep
29
revised Decomposition of Matrices in Semisimple and Nilpotent Parts
added 82 characters in body
Sep
29
answered Decomposition of Matrices in Semisimple and Nilpotent Parts
Sep
29
revised Are D_dR and D_st “potentially comparable”?
added 62 characters in body
Sep
29
comment Are D_dR and D_st “potentially comparable”?
By the way, these "thin subsets" are called "parties fines" in our article. I suspect that my coauthor was playing a joke on me (and the readers) since I later found out that in French, "partie fine" also means "orgy".
Sep
29
answered Are D_dR and D_st “potentially comparable”?
Sep
6
comment local galois representation with higher coefficient
If you're looking at linear representations of $G$ with coefficients, then everything works "the same". See for example 3.1 of Breuil-Mézard's 2002 Duke paper.
Sep
6
revised local galois representation with higher coefficient
added 4 characters in body
Sep
6
revised local galois representation with higher coefficient
added 191 characters in body
Sep
6
comment local galois representation with higher coefficient
You also changed the setting completely. Is $F$ an extension of $K$ or a subfield of $K$??
Sep
6
answered local galois representation with higher coefficient
Aug
16
comment Is there a “trianguline period ring”, or is one expected?
This ring has not been studied. At some point, my student Di Matteo was interested in it, so you could ask him.
Aug
4
comment Valuations on tensor products
Isn't this just a matter of saying $v(b \otimes c) = v(b) + v(c)$ and letting the valuation of an element of $B \otimes C$ be the sup, over all possible ways to write the element as $\sum b_i \otimes c_i$, of $\inf_i v(b_i \otimes c_i)$?