Daniel Asimov
Reputation
751
Top tag
Next privilege 1,000 Rep.
 Feb 24 comment Lie Groups and Manifolds The orientation-preserving isometries of the circle is a circle. In general the identity component of the isometry group of an n-torus R^n / L (where L is an n-dimensional lattice in R^n) is the very same n-torus acting on itself by addition. But it would still be nice to find a Riemannian structure on a Lie group G whose full isometry group is the same Lie group G. Dec 21 comment Which manifolds admit a diffeomorphism of order $n$? The surface of genus 2 has a diffeomorphism of order 5: Imagine a "carousel" of two parallel closed decagonal 2-disks in 3-space that are connected by 5 equally spaced half-twisted strips between their alternate corresponding edges. This surface has just one boundary component, which we cap off with a 2-disk. It's then easy to check that this is an orientable surface of genus 2, and that rotating the carousel by 2π/5 extends to the 2-disk cap, thereby effecting a diffeomorphism of order 5. Jan 11 comment Are there smooth bodies of constant width? I took a look at the Fillmore paper, and just before his Corollary to Theorem 2 -- which reads "Corollary. There exists an analytic hypersurface of constant width in E^n having the same group of symmetries as a regular n-simplex." -- he writes "If we imitate the construction of a Reuleux triangle . . .. Thus:" This seems to imply that he is assuming that [the intersection of four balls in 3-space, centered at the vertices of a regular tetrahedron and each with radius = the side-length of the tetrahedron] is a body of constant width. But this is known to be false. Dec 24 comment $SU(2)$ and the three sphere It's not so much that you also need det(x) = 1, as that this is exactly the same as saying |a|2 + |b|2 = 1. Sep 14 comment Riemann zeta at even integers In the functional equation for ζ(s), the term Γ(s) should be Γ(s/2), and the term Γ(1-s) should be Γ((1-s)/2). Aug 13 comment Irreducible homology 3-spheres that bound smooth contractible manifolds The usual contractible 2-complex discovered by Bing is called a "House With Two Rooms", and this is not what is depicted in the image above this answer. The 2-complex depicted is not contractible (since a loop around either inner cylinder is a nontrivial 1-cycle, as is easily verified). To obtain the House With Two Rooms, one needs to add two disjoint rectangles IxI to the image, each one intersecting one inner cylinder in an interval, the outer cylinder in an interval, and the 2-complex depicted in its entire (rectangular) boundary circle. Aug 16 comment How well can we localize the “exoticness” in exotic R^4? Removing a standard $D^4$ from a potentially-exotic smooth $S^4$ yields a potentially-exotic $\mathbb{R}^4$ that's standard at infinity. So if it were known that the latter must be globally standard, then replacing the $D^4$ would imply the original $S^4$ is standard, and hence the 4-dimensional smooth Poincaré conjecture. And there's essentially only one way to replace the $D^4$, since Gamma_4 = 0 (Cerf) implies oriented diffeos of $S^3$ are smoothly isotopic. Aug 15 comment Measure on real Grassmannians For one application, an explicit curve {C(t) : t in [0,oo)}, dense in a Grassmannian of 2-planes in n-space, is the basis for the animation technique in statistical computer graphics known as the Grand Tour. It's important to ensure that as t -> oo, the curve C spends time in any open set U proportional to the invariant measure* of U. * Though the invariant measure on a Grassmannian is unique up to a scalar multiple, the invariant metric is not in the sole case of 2-planes in 4-space. This oriented Grassmannian's metric is the product of two round 2-spheres whose radii may be in any ratio. Aug 10 comment Topological spaces that resemble the space of irrationals Hello, Ethan. Yes, indeed -- as you may recall, I proved that (as well as an n-dimensional version) in a class of yours on PL topology around 1970. Aug 7 comment Topological spaces that resemble the space of irrationals It's also amusing that given n, the complement of any countable dense subset of R^n is homeomorphic to the complement of any other such. Jul 16 comment Infinite games: are they well defined? Oops, that should have read, "There must be a first countable ordinal beta at which there are no unclaimed members of J; the player whose turn it is at beta is defined as the winner. Jul 16 comment Infinite games: are they well defined? (Cont'd.) Assume "whose turn it is" has been defined for all countable limit ordinals, and hence by alternation for all countable ordinals. Then it's not even necessary to predefine the length of the game. A simple example is this: let J be any countably infinite set. Each player on their turn claims some member of J. There must be a first countable ordinal at which the last member of J is claimed: the player who did that is defined as the winner. (I hope to expand on this soon in a short article.) Jul 16 comment Infinite games: are they well defined? Incidentally, there's no reason that the plays of an infinite ordinal game must be indexed by omega. Any infinite ordinal lambda will do, though let's just be concerned about countable ordinals here. Special care must be taken to know whose turn it is at each play (whose index is some ordinal < lambda). This is easily accomplished in a "fair" way as long as whose turn it is is defined for limit ordinals; this is not difficult. (Successor ordinals just follow the alternating turn rule, as for the case lambda = omega.) Jul 15 comment Google question: In a country in which people only want boys "... larger populations have more girls ..." No, since the population size is meaningful only if something is known about the number of families. In order to use the Strong Law of Large Numbers we assume infinitely many families #1,#2,#3,... with each one's sequence of births (G^n)B being concatenated in order of family #. Then the stochastic process generating this infinite sequence of G's and B's is isomorphic (up to measure 0) with repeated flips of a fair coin. Hence the SLLN implies the asymptotic fraction of B's or G's is 1/2, each with probability = 1. This is, to me, conclusive. Jul 8 comment Google question: In a country in which people only want boys 1. The words "a social convention cannot override biology" (not mine) mean just that the ultimate proportions of boys and girls are the same as the proportions in which boys and girls are born. 2. The stopping rule (in question) is a red herring because any stopping rule of the form "Stop as soon as a certain consecutive string of B's and G's occurs" will result in the same ratio of 1:1 (or more generally p:q) as the probabilities of B vs. G (or H vs. T) are in. 3. You are right that the 2:1 stopping rule is not almost certain to occur. Oops. 4. What modification are you thinking of? Jul 6 comment Google question: In a country in which people only want boys Zare falls into exactly the trap I mention in my first paragraph. Jul 5 comment Which manifolds admit a diffeomorphism of order $n$? Wow, that's an interesting example. Thank you. Jul 4 comment How is it that you can guess if one of a pair of random numbers is larger with probability > 1/2? I think you mean Randall Munroe. Jun 17 comment Examples of common false beliefs in mathematics There are many situations where one needs to speak of a set of two numbers that may or may not be equal. E.g.: "Let x1, x2 ∈ ℝ. Then among all the open intervals containing the set {x1, x2}, none of them is contained in all the others." If one is addressing mathematicians, there is no need to specify that x1 might be equal to x2. Jun 12 comment Examples of common false beliefs in mathematics In case that wasn't clear: F(x) = ln(x) + C_1 for x > 0, and F(x) = ln(-x) + C_2 for x < 0, where C_1 and C_2 are arbitrary real constants.