bio | website | itr.unisa.edu.au/~mckillrg |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 4 years |
seen | Apr 16 at 9:11 | |
stats | profile views | 818 |
Jun 25 |
awarded | Revival |
Apr 15 |
awarded | Yearling |
Nov 13 |
revised |
Maximum magnitude subset sum
deleted 4 characters in body |
Nov 13 |
comment |
Maximum magnitude subset sum
@Gerry My bad, I obviously mean positive integer! Fixed. |
Nov 13 |
comment |
Maximum magnitude subset sum
@Ricky Thanks, I've made that change. |
Nov 13 |
revised |
Maximum magnitude subset sum
changes R^m to Z^m |
Nov 13 |
asked | Maximum magnitude subset sum |
Jun 13 |
comment |
Are Gaussian Processes more important than other stochastic processes?
+1 Couldn't agree more. Sometimes, I think it is a miracle that anything works at all. If I had a dollar for everytime I read, ''Assume that the noise is additive white and Gaussian'', I would be a rich man. |
Jun 11 |
comment |
Maximum of the norm of k-averages of n iid random d-dimensional vectors
Sounds like you want a 'maximal inequality'. Not exactly sure how to do what you are asking by I would start at Section 3 of stat.yale.edu/~pollard/Papers/Pollard89StatSci.pdf. |
Jun 11 |
comment |
Hyperplane arrangements and covering numbers
Thanks! I also found Bernard Chazelle's `The discrepency method' to have the same proof on page 206. |
Jun 11 |
accepted | Hyperplane arrangements and covering numbers |
Jun 10 |
comment |
Hyperplane arrangements and covering numbers
Yes, the hyperplanes are affine. |
Jun 10 |
asked | Hyperplane arrangements and covering numbers |
Apr 15 |
awarded | Yearling |
Oct 29 |
comment |
Exponential (or other) families of distributions on manifolds.
I would guess that the answer is `not really'. As far as I know there is not a even a universally accepted definition of the 'normal distribution' on a Remanian Manifold. Probably the closest thing to the normal are those distributions that arise from generalisations of Brownian motion on manifolds. math.northwestern.edu/~ehsu/… |
Aug 15 |
comment |
Point-wise error estimate in polynomial regression
Sorry, silly typo. Should work just fine for any set of basis functions. |
Aug 15 |
revised |
Point-wise error estimate in polynomial regression
fixed typos |
Aug 13 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Aug 13 |
answered | Point-wise error estimate in polynomial regression |
Jul 28 |
revised |
More multinomial type integrals over the hypercube
deleted 114 characters in body |