bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 5 years, 3 months |
seen | yesterday | |
stats | profile views | 620 |
こんなページを見ていないでさっさと仕事に戻るんだ！
Apr 15 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
Jul 15 |
asked | Properties of the induced map between inertia stacks |
Jul 2 |
awarded | Curious |
Nov 22 |
comment |
Borel localization with Mayer-Vietoris sequence
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.topol.2005.10.013 Is this what you are looking for? |
Nov 4 |
accepted | Representation ring and induced representation |
Nov 4 |
revised |
Representation ring and induced representation
I moved the answer which was in my question below. Delete the request for references. |
Nov 4 |
answered | Representation ring and induced representation |
Oct 23 |
accepted | Vector bundles on a weighted projective stack |
Oct 20 |
awarded | Informed |
Oct 17 |
revised |
Vector bundles on a weighted projective stack
Corrected the dimension in the 1st note. |
Oct 17 |
asked | Vector bundles on a weighted projective stack |
Oct 15 |
accepted | Why do we need a $G$-universe? |
Oct 15 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Oct 14 |
comment |
Why do we need a $G$-universe?
I asked my question on SE, but I deleted it, because MO seems to be more suitable for the question. |
Oct 14 |
asked | Why do we need a $G$-universe? |
Sep 28 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Sep 10 |
comment |
Representation ring and induced representation
@MarcPalm I'm sorry for confusing notation. And your comment is right in the sense that I need only the adjoint property of the induced representations. |
Sep 10 |
comment |
Representation ring and induced representation
I added an answer to my question. But I am still looking for any good explanation of representation rings and (topological) $K$-theory. |
Sep 10 |
revised |
Representation ring and induced representation
Add an answer to my question |
Sep 10 |
comment |
Representation ring and induced representation
@MarcPalm I can not understand how we can remove the representation theory from the definition of $\iota_*$. The map $i_*$ is independent of representation, but $\iota_*$ involves the induced representation. |