Impact
~10k
people reached
- 0 posts edited
- 0 helpful flags
- 44 votes cast
Aug
16 |
awarded | Populist |
Dec
1 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Oct
13 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Mar
19 |
awarded | Yearling |
Mar
15 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Mar
19 |
awarded | Yearling |
Mar
22 |
awarded | Commentator |
Mar
22 |
comment |
A set for which it is hard to determine whether or not it is countable.
A quick google search yields deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/32762/1/0000133.pdf , but I don't know what the "canonical" reference is. |
Mar
20 |
awarded | Yearling |
Feb
10 |
comment |
Random knot on six vertices
@Joseph: Thanks. It seems so obvious now. I guess that will teach me not to make conjectures in the middle of the night based on very little numerical evidence... |
Feb
10 |
answered | Random knot on six vertices |
Aug
17 |
accepted | Consecutive integers with many prime factors |
Aug
17 |
comment |
Consecutive integers with many prime factors
@drvitek: I agree that this is a very elegant answer. Thanks for observing that it also provides an upper bound. It's actually about 5 orders of magnitude better in the case $m=n=4$, but still too large to be of practical value. We can just let k run from 0 to m-1 instead and get $\prod_{i=1}^{16} p_i$ which is around 3E19. |
Aug
12 |
asked | Consecutive integers with many prime factors |
Jul
29 |
answered | Math puzzles for dinner |
Jul
2 |
comment |
Mean minimum distance for K random points on a N-dimensional (hyper-)cube
You may be interested in some of J. Philip's papers at <math.kth.se/~johanph/>;. |
Jul
1 |
accepted | Which tensor fields on a symplectic manifold are invariant under all Hamiltonian vector fields? |
Jun
29 |
asked | Which tensor fields on a symplectic manifold are invariant under all Hamiltonian vector fields? |
Jun
28 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Jun
25 |
awarded | Mortarboard |