Rami
|
Registered User
|
|
|
Mar 17 |
awarded | ● Yearling |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Compact subgroups of the unitary group of operators in a hilbert space @Amin: What is the question? |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Compact subgroups of the unitary group of operators in a hilbert space @Yemon Choi: Yes |
|
Feb 13 |
answered | Compact subgroups of the unitary group of operators in a hilbert space |
|
Feb 13 |
revised |
Compact subgroups of the unitary group of operators in a hilbert space edited tags |
|
Feb 3 |
comment |
Flat morphisms whose fibers are affine spaces If instad of the affine space you would have the protective one, than I think that the answer s positive. If you are interested I can try to write a proof |
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
Flat morphisms whose fibers are affine spaces Did you check Angelo's answer to mathoverflow.net/questions/58009/… ? It seems to be very related to your question |
|
Jan 11 |
answered | Moving one family of commuting self-adjoint operators to another without losing commutativity on the way |
|
Jan 10 |
comment |
Moving one family of commuting self-adjoint operators to another without losing commutativity on the way I think that the proof the you gave for the f.d. case works also for compact operators. But you probably know that. |
|
Dec 18 |
awarded | ● Organizer |
|
Dec 14 |
comment |
English reference for the Grauert–Riemenschneider vanishing theorem Lazarsfeld, Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I. (Page 257, Theorem 4.3.9.) is exactly what I need. I could not deduce from the statement in Kollar-Mori the formulation that I need, may be I just did not find the correct statement. Anyhow it dose not matter. Thank you again |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
English reference for the Grauert–Riemenschneider vanishing theorem Thank you very much |
|
Dec 8 |
asked | English reference for the Grauert–Riemenschneider vanishing theorem |
|
Nov 27 |
accepted | Cartan decomposition of a unitary group? |
|
Nov 26 |
comment |
$n$-path-connected components of a variety Hailong Dao, are you implying that the minimal number $n$ is a bi-rational invariant? It make sense. If it so it gives a good strategy for 2 and probably 3, in view of the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_model_program. |
|
Nov 26 |
comment |
$n$-path-connected components of a variety I'm almost sure the the answer for 1 is positive. I'll try to write an argument. |
|
Nov 25 |
answered | Cartan decomposition of a unitary group? |
|
Nov 25 |
comment |
Cartan decomposition of a unitary group? 1. Please edit your question such that it will mansion that $F$ is a local field . 2. please take care about the (2) subscript in the definition of $M$. Probably you just need to replace (2) by {2}. I'll try to answer your question soon |
