bio  website  math.umass.edu/~jeh 

location  U. Massachusetts, Amherst  
age  75  
visits  member for  5 years, 3 months 
seen  9 hours ago  
stats  profile views  15,950 
Moreorless retired professor at UMass Amherst.
Basically an algebraist with interests in Lie theory,
specifically representation theory and related
algebraic geometry.
1d

revised 
Algebraic groups “generated” by a Lie algebra element
added 27 characters in body 
1d

answered  Algebraic groups “generated” by a Lie algebra element 
May 21 
comment 
Preprint by Wall on Sjogren's theorem
Wall's paper is short (and the volume exists in many libraries), but the standard Springer link online gives only the first two pages: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/BFb0100741#page1 
May 21 
comment 
real representation of a product group
@Qiaochu: I was only commenting on the fact that finite groups seldom benefit from being viewed as compact Lie groups. Of course, they technically fall under this heading, but does anyone use Lie theory to study representations of arbitrary finite groups? Most of the essential Lie theory presupposes connectedness. (Of course it's true historically in the other direction that finite group ideas helped inspire some developments for compact groups.) 
May 20 
comment 
About supersolvable Lie algebras
I'm not sure where this definition is stated, but your version doesn't make sense. Can you be more exact about sources (and try to avoid anonymous sources)? 
May 20 
comment 
real representation of a product group
@Qiaochu: Yes, but finite groups are usually misleading when regarded as compact Lie groups. Maybe the definition allows for this, but books treating representations of compact Lie groups don't usually cover finite groups and their rich theory beyond perhaps noting that some ideas for the compact (usually connected) groups arise by analogy from the FrobeniusSchur theory. Fine points of the representations of compact Lie groups usually involve maximal tori, Weyl groups, roots, etc. 
May 20 
comment 
real representation of a product group
@Megan: I'm confused by your example, since there is no obvious structure of "compact Lie group" on $\mathbb{Z}_p$. How are you defining compact Lie groups? 
May 16 
comment 
Which padic algebraic groups are type I?
@Alain: Note that Joseph Bernstein's name has an extra "n", though there is also a mathematician named Berstein. (To add to the name confusion, early English translations of Russian papers coauthored by Joseph Bernstein gave his initials as I.N.) 
May 16 
comment 
Which padic algebraic groups are type I?
To add a further link for those wanting Bernstein's note in the original Russian: mathnet.ru/php/… 
May 15 
comment 
How bad can $\pi_1$ of a linear group orbit be?
@hic: While algebraic groups (as in your reference to McNinch and Sommers) come into play indirectly here, the component groups in the purely algebraic situation are always finite. 
May 15 
awarded  Notable Question 
May 12 
comment 
Motivation for a representation of the Witt algebra
These are useful but informal (and sometimes incomplete) lecture notes with minimal references, so it's better for you to consult published sources along with the notes. Aside from that, the variable $z$ here appears at the very beginning and differentiation obeys the usual rules. The notation comes from the way physicists use calculus, but here the setup is more abstract and algebraic. 
May 9 
comment 
A table for irreducible integral representation of finite cyclic groups
Concerning the edit, it's worth emphasizing that there is a big difference between "irreducible" and "indecomposable" in this kind of representation theory. 
May 7 
revised 
Representation Theory of Lie Groups: Reference Request
deleted 1 character in body 
May 7 
answered  Representation Theory of Lie Groups: Reference Request 
May 6 
revised 
Reference for class of involutions containing longest element of finite Coxeter group?
added 7 characters in body 
May 5 
asked  Reference for class of involutions containing longest element of finite Coxeter group? 
Apr 29 
comment 
What is the importance of the number $k+h^{∨}$ (level+dual Coxeter number)?
I can't provide an answer, but maybe it's worthwhile to point out that the question is indirectly related to the mysterious role of the "critical level" usually defined as $k = h^\vee$: in this extreme case your number is 0 and can't be divided out. At the critical level the representations of an affine Lie algebra turn out to be closely related to characteristic $p$ representations. 
Apr 27 
awarded  Good Answer 
Apr 24 
comment 
Centralizer of a nonregular Lie algebra element
The formulation of the question isn't clear to me: is the Lie algebra here just the full $n \times n$ matrix algebra over $\mathbb{C}$? In general, a "regular" element of a semisimple (or reductive) Lie algebra is one whose centralizer has minimal dimension, necessarily equal to the rank. This makes sense even if the element isn't semisimple (= diagonalizable over algebraic closure). Moreover, the centralizer is then commutative (an abelian Lie algebra), but in general that's far from true. There is a lot of literature about this in the Lie algebra or the algebraic group setting. 