bio | website | pcwww.liv.ac.uk/~lrempe |
---|---|---|
location | Liverpool | |
age | 37 | |
visits | member for | 5 years, 2 months |
seen | Mar 26 at 13:10 | |
stats | profile views | 954 |
Professor of Pure Mathematics at the University of Liverpool
Feb 16 |
answered | Palis' conjecture and Newhouse's results |
Jan 30 |
awarded | Yearling |
Jan 26 |
comment |
What are the worst notations, in your opinion ?
Actually, I take issue with both of these notations. :) As a dynamicist, I would indeed agree that $\sin^2$ should be the second iterate of sine. However, $\sin$ is not invertible, and hence $\sin^{-1}$ should not be used for the arcsine, which is only a specific branch of the inverse function. $(\sin|_{[-\pi/2,\pi/2]})^{-1}$ would be ok I suppose ... |
Jan 5 |
answered | Complex function for mapping a circle to a superellipse |
Dec 23 |
answered | Is there any elementary proof of No wandering domain for polynomials |
Dec 23 |
comment |
Is there any elementary proof of No wandering domain for polynomials
This is really still Sullivan's proof, however. In other words, it still uses quasiconformal deformations and (crucially) finite-dimensionality of the parameter space. |
Dec 17 |
comment |
Entire function bounded at every line
My article "Hyperbolic entire functions with full hyperbolic dimension and approximation by Eremenko-Lyubich functions" also treats this Cauchy integral method in quite some generality. (arxiv.org/abs/1106.3439 , ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=3214678 ). |
Dec 15 |
comment |
Gauss--Lucas type theorem for tracts and higher derivatives of a polynomial
@TrevorRichards a) The convex hull of the set of zeros of an entire function will in general be much larger than the "tracts" in question, so $f$ would normally be expected to be unbounded on this convex hull (e.g. consider the zeros of the function e^{z^3}-1); b) There may be some limiting zeros of polynomials that "disappear", so that the convex hull of the zeros of the polynomials may not converge to the convex hull of the zeros of the limiting functions. |
Dec 12 |
comment |
Gauss--Lucas type theorem for tracts and higher derivatives of a polynomial
@TrevorRichards Re: Question 2) - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… |
Dec 12 |
comment |
Gauss--Lucas type theorem for tracts and higher derivatives of a polynomial
@TrevorRichards Alternatively, if you are looking for explicit examples of polynomials, I suggest looking at some Shabat polynomials (= polynomial Belyi functions), i.e. polynomials with two critical values (or -1 and 1 may be the best normalisation for your question). Given any tree, with an embedding in the plane, there is a Shabat polynomial realising this tree. There are some programs for computing these (eg Don Marshall's "zipper", and Laurent Bartholdi also has a program). Not sure they're publicly available, but they exist. Just draw some "complicated" trees and experiment .. |
Dec 12 |
comment |
Gauss--Lucas type theorem for tracts and higher derivatives of a polynomial
@TrevorRichards: The trouble with the "easy" examples is that they all essentially look like e^z, which does not have higher-order critical points ... One case of entire functions with a finite set of singular values that it's relatively easy to get your hands on, and that have quite different tracts from exponential maps, are Poincaré (linearising) functions of post-critically finite polynomials around repelling periodic points. |
Dec 11 |
answered | Gauss--Lucas type theorem for tracts and higher derivatives of a polynomial |
Nov 25 |
revised |
A question on deficient values of entire functions
Corrected spelling and grammar. |
Nov 25 |
suggested | approved edit on A question on deficient values of entire functions |
Nov 25 |
answered | A question on deficient values of entire functions |
Nov 25 |
revised |
Is there an (almost) dense set of quadratic polynomials which is not in the interior of the Mandelbrot set?
Extended the answer. |
Nov 24 |
revised |
Is there an (almost) dense set of quadratic polynomials which is not in the interior of the Mandelbrot set?
Slightly reformulated the question to make it more descriptive. Fixed some grammar/wording, and tried to add some clarification (hopefully without changing the intention of the author or basic structure of the question). |
Nov 24 |
suggested | approved edit on Is there an (almost) dense set of quadratic polynomials which is not in the interior of the Mandelbrot set? |
Nov 24 |
answered | Is there an (almost) dense set of quadratic polynomials which is not in the interior of the Mandelbrot set? |
Nov 2 |
comment |
13 months and not even one report. what would you do?
Know it's a bit late, but glad to hear that things worked out. |