bio | website | |
---|---|---|

location | ||

age | ||

visits | member for | 5 years, 10 months |

seen | Jun 6 '14 at 18:41 | |

stats | profile views | 1,998 |

Oct
18 |
awarded | Nice Answer |

Oct
14 |
awarded | Yearling |

Sep
30 |
awarded | Nice Answer |

Jul
21 |
awarded | Taxonomist |

May
19 |
awarded | Revival |

Mar
12 |
awarded | Nice Answer |

Feb
12 |
awarded | Good Answer |

Oct
14 |
awarded | Yearling |

Aug
19 |
awarded | Necromancer |

Aug
7 |
comment |
What is the role of B-field $B \in H^2(X,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ in mathematics?
@GunnarMagnusson Perhaps the OP is looking for connections to other parts of mathematics? The mirror symmetry B-field is a cohomological shadow of more complicated objects. |

Aug
7 |
comment |
What is the role of B-field $B \in H^2(X,\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})$ in mathematics?
In what sort of mathematics? The $B$-field can have many roles, dpeend on context. |

Jul
17 |
comment |
Have Dirac's negative probabilities been furthered in modern probability theory?
This question is based on a misunderstanding of what Dirac meant by negative probabilities. They were a bug in a model he was considering, not a new mathematical concept he wanted to introduce. This question should be closed. |

Jun
25 |
awarded | Electorate |

Jun
25 |
awarded | Suffrage |

Jun
25 |
awarded | Pundit |

Jun
10 |
comment |
Explanations for mathematicians, about the falsifiability (or not) of string theory
@SebastienPalcoux I think you may be confused about the purpose of MathOverflow. Please take the advice Will Jagy gave you on Meta. |

Jun
10 |
comment |
Explanations for mathematicians, about the falsifiability (or not) of string theory
@SebastienPalcoux: It's standard practice on MathOverflow to explain why you've downvoted a question. Aaron was correct to put the comment where he did. |

May
1 |
comment |
are moduli stacks deligne-mumford stacks in general
The question specifies 'over the complex numbers', which rules out all of the examples listed so far. I think Ravi's right that we should expect DM in the case of complex algebraic objects with finite automorphism groups. |

Mar
13 |
comment |
Geometric treatment of the Ward-Takahashi identity
@JeffHarvey All true. I've only sketched out the basic idea above. The OP didn't write enough for me to bother with more than that. |

Feb
26 |
revised |
Geometric treatment of the Ward-Takahashi identity
added 1 characters in body |