bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 5 years, 10 months |
seen | Feb 24 '11 at 15:49 | |
stats | profile views | 532 |
Jul
9 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Apr
12 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Jan
12 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Oct
20 |
awarded | Yearling |
Aug
28 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Aug
7 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Jul
2 |
awarded | Curious |
Apr
2 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Oct
20 |
awarded | Yearling |
Jun
25 |
awarded | nt.number-theory |
Nov
16 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Oct
20 |
awarded | Yearling |
Aug
5 |
awarded | Taxonomist |
Apr
13 |
awarded | Enlightened |
Apr
12 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Feb
19 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Oct
21 |
awarded | Yearling |
Nov
26 |
answered | Is there an elementary proof that the Mertens function is not $O(x^\theta)$ if $\theta <1/2$? |
Nov
10 |
comment |
Ideal Class Number
Dedekind's proof is in his book on algebraic numbers. This was translated into English (Richard Dedekind - Theory of Algebraic Integers - translated by John Stillwell, CUP 1996). The proof uses the pigeon hole principle, which is hardly surprising. |
Nov
10 |
comment |
Ideal Class Number
@David: You can use the Poisson summation formula to give a Mellin transform identity for the Dedekind zeta function, from which the nature of the singularity at $s = 1$ is clear. Harold M. Stark wrote an expository paper in which he sketched a proof of the Dirichlet Unit Theorem by this approach, among other things. The application of the Poisson summation formula is called the Hecke theta formula, and is central to Hecke's proof of the functional equation of the Dedekind zeta function. |