Impact
~4k
people reached
- 0 posts edited
- 5 helpful flags
- 53 votes cast
Dec
25 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Apr
27 |
accepted | Approximating the norm of an operator-valued linear function with operator inputs via a matrix-valued linear function |
Apr
27 |
comment |
Approximating the norm of an operator-valued linear function with operator inputs via a matrix-valued linear function
In the exact case, how do you get the projections? |
Apr
27 |
asked | Approximating the norm of an operator-valued linear function with operator inputs via a matrix-valued linear function |
Mar
16 |
comment |
A conjecture regarding the integral of the square of an entire function
What about the function $f(t) = (\sin^2(t) + e^{-t})^t?$ |
Feb
6 |
awarded | Disciplined |
Dec
4 |
asked | Calculating the dimension of the algebra generated by some given matrices |
Sep
17 |
comment |
Does this simple inequality have a name?
I guess this is equivalent to the inequality $x^2 \leq x(m+M) - Mm,$ since it must be true term by term ($n=1$ case seems to imply the claim in general). So that inequality might have a name if such a thing exists. The fact that $M \geq x$ then immediately implies the claim, so it might not, because it could be seen as being too easy, since it doesn't seem like there's any trick. |
Sep
7 |
accepted | Moments of the trace of orthogonal matrices |
Sep
6 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
Sep
5 |
comment |
Moments of the trace of orthogonal matrices
This is an amazing amount of data. I wonder if it's in any of the triangles in the OEIS (Like Pascal's triangle or Stirling numbers.) |
Sep
5 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Sep
5 |
awarded | Curious |
Sep
4 |
revised |
Moments of the trace of orthogonal matrices
edited body |
Sep
4 |
comment |
Moments of the trace of orthogonal matrices
I don't really know what you mean by $A'$ above, nor do I know enough about the values of zonal polynomials. However since I think I am calculating $E_X[\text{tr}(X)^k]$ in your language, is it the case that we will have some cancellation in this formula (the $\lambda$ might cancel the zonal polynomial factors out, but I don't know what you mean by scaling)? (Also in the denominator do you mean $(2k)!$ or $2(k!)$? I guess there's also a similar question about the numerator.) |
Sep
4 |
comment |
Moments of the trace of orthogonal matrices
Thanks. This is the formula I spotted. However, I want a formula for that holds for large $k,$ (in some sense the $n$ I am choosing is small and fixed) for example if $n=3.$ The above formula doesn't give me enough information. |
Sep
4 |
asked | Moments of the trace of orthogonal matrices |
Aug
19 |
comment |
Is there an algebraic number that cannot be expressed using only elementary functions?
In your post on stackexchange you allowed $i,$ and other elemenary complex analysis: do you still want to do this? It seems if you include integration, it would be possible to express any algebraic number this way. Anyway for an algebraic number $a$ with minimum polynomial $p,$ $a = \int_{\gamma} \frac{zp'(z)}{p(z)} dz,$ where $\gamma$ is a circle with rational radius and center, containing $a$ and no other roots of $p.$ |
Aug
7 |
comment |
Invertibility of random Vandermonde matrix
Yeah, you definitely need to use non-atomicity. I think you need something a bit stronger, since if the points lie in certain varieties, you may run into trouble. |
Aug
7 |
answered | Invertibility of random Vandermonde matrix |