16 reputation
3
bio website
location
age
visits member for 1 year, 5 months
seen Mar 12 '13 at 5:15

Feb
24
awarded  Editor
Feb
24
revised Integration of Binomial Differentials Proof/Reference
deleted 10 characters in body
Feb
24
asked Integration of Binomial Differentials Proof/Reference
Feb
21
comment First Order PDE Solution Method Issues
that there is a huge distinction & that this simply has to have been completely glossed over in most of the literature, & that I'm probably not going to get an answer to this. I do appreciate that the pictue you've described is the way one thinks about Cauchy's method of characteristics but that interpretation doesn't explain the other interpretations unfortunately.
Feb
21
comment First Order PDE Solution Method Issues
Thanks very much for the response, if I am to take from your answer that I was correct about the "dishonesty involved" in thinking of the notation as anything other than symbolic notation it doesn't explain why dishonest interpretations give general solutions while correct ones give only complete integrals. Also that interpretation doesn't explain whether Chapit's method is a dishonest exposition of Cauchy's method in classical books, & based on the abstract of this article I'm almost convinced
Feb
21
awarded  Supporter
Feb
20
awarded  Student
Feb
20
asked First Order PDE Solution Method Issues