andy teich
Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 200 Rep.
1 5
Impact
~1k people reached

• 0 posts edited

# 32 Actions

 Jan 22 revised Discrete measures and discrete kernels added 49 characters in body Jan 22 comment Discrete measures and discrete kernels I added the definition of support. Jan 22 revised Discrete measures and discrete kernels Added definition of $\text{supp}\mu.$ Jan 22 comment Discrete measures and discrete kernels Well, $K(x,\cdot)$ is also defined for $x\neq x_k.$ So the question is, if $K$ is still measurable in $x$ Jan 21 asked Discrete measures and discrete kernels Nov 19 accepted Relative interior and dense subsets Nov 19 comment Relative interior and dense subsets @Kallus: you want to give this as an answer? Nov 18 comment Relative interior and dense subsets But your second argument seems to be plausible... Nov 18 comment Relative interior and dense subsets I think you are mixing up interior with relative interior. The relative interior of a non-empty convex set is always nonempty!!! Nov 18 revised Relative interior and dense subsets edited body Nov 18 asked Relative interior and dense subsets Jun 6 awarded Enthusiast May 20 comment Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures What do you mean by universal property?Can you specify a bit more what you mean by compatibility in the first part? May 17 accepted Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures May 16 awarded Commentator May 16 comment Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures This is really beautiful!The only thing I have still to think about is the existence of such a sequence $(\mathbb P_n){n\in\mathbb N}$... May 16 comment Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures @Davide : Does a weka*-compact substet necessarily have to be totally ordered? May 15 comment Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures @George Lowther : do you have a proof for this? So the answer given by Davide Giraudo is not true when the maps $Z$ are bounded? May 14 comment Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures @Gerald Edgar: "...the usual way to define it is to use continuous $Z$." Maybe you realized that we are working on measurable spaces and there is no notion of continuity... May 14 comment Existence of dominating measure for weak*-compact set of measures I forgot boundedness! sorry