current community
chat
blog
MathOverflow
MathOverflow Meta
your communities
Sign up
or
log in
to customize your list.
more stack exchange communities
Stack Exchange
sign up
log in
tour
help
Tour
Start here for a quick overview of the site
Help Center
Detailed answers to any questions you might have
Meta
Discuss the workings and policies of this site
MathOverflow
Questions
Tags
Users
Badges
Unanswered
Ask Question
user28187
less info
network profile
16
reputation
2
bio
website
location
age
visits
member for
1 year, 9 months
seen
Nov 20 '12 at 3:48
stats
profile views
38
16
reputation
bio
website
visits
member for
1 year, 9 months
2
badges
location
seen
Nov 20 '12 at 3:48
summary
answers
questions
tags
badges
favorites
bounties
reputation
activity
15
Actions
suggestions
reviews
revisions
comments
badges
posts
accepts
all
Nov
19
comment
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
I was thinking to use some sort of Bayesian inference scheme, but if there is a simpler method...
Nov
19
comment
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
@fedja Provided a sufficient number of samplings, is there a known "best" method of deciding whether the element $x_q$ exists in $X$?
Nov
19
comment
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
@fedja I can probably afford something like ~10^5 samplings, though I'd be interested in what theory has to say regardless of feasibility.
Nov
19
revised
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
added 36 characters in body
Nov
19
comment
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
@fedja Ah, $R$ is defined earlier as the set of rate parameters associated with the exponentially distributed random variables in $X$.
Nov
19
comment
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
@fedja I have added some specifications for $N$ and $w$ in Note 2. I can tighten them as needed. $R - \lambda_q$ is meant to be the set $R$ without the element $\lambda_q$ (perhaps this notation is incorrect?)
Nov
19
revised
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
added 76 characters in body; added 34 characters in body
Nov
19
revised
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
added 73 characters in body
Nov
18
revised
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
added 132 characters in body
Nov
18
revised
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
added 14 characters in body
Nov
18
comment
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
@Anthony Quas Fair point. I am looking for a bound in terms of $N$, and I have changed the question to specify that we know $N$.
Nov
18
awarded
Editor
Nov
18
revised
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
added 24 characters in body
Nov
17
awarded
Student
Nov
17
asked
Deciding whether or not an exponentially distributed random variable exists in a set via the use of a “black box” function
MathOverflow works best with JavaScript enabled