bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 2 years, 3 months |
seen | 5 hours ago | |
stats | profile views | 86 |
Dec 10 |
comment |
Spherical Harmonic approximation of functions on the cube
I'm sorry that was a mistake. Of course I meant the boundary. |
Dec 10 |
revised |
Spherical Harmonic approximation of functions on the cube
added 25 characters in body |
Dec 10 |
asked | Spherical Harmonic approximation of functions on the cube |
Apr 2 |
awarded | Critic |
Apr 2 |
revised |
Galois descent for semilinear endomorphisms
edited tags; edited tags |
Mar 27 |
comment |
Galois descent for semilinear endomorphisms
I edited my Question to give mor information. |
Mar 27 |
comment |
Galois descent for semilinear endomorphisms
@Keerthi Madapusi Pera: Yes, see my EDIT. |
Mar 27 |
revised |
Galois descent for semilinear endomorphisms
added 939 characters in body; edited body |
Mar 26 |
asked | Galois descent for semilinear endomorphisms |
Mar 23 |
comment |
Two different definitions of $\sigma$-L-spaces in Kottwitz I and II
Thanks for the comments. I was not aware that $F^{nr}$ is the compositum of $F$ and $K$ in this case. Can you perhaps give a reference? Kottwitz assumes in his paper that $k$ is algebraically closed. But actually I'm interested in the more general situation of $k$ just a perfect field of char. $p$. Do the definitions agree in this more general situation? |
Mar 23 |
revised |
Two different definitions of $\sigma$-L-spaces in Kottwitz I and II
added 230 characters in body |
Mar 23 |
revised |
Two different definitions of $\sigma$-L-spaces in Kottwitz I and II
deleted 215 characters in body |
Mar 22 |
revised |
Two different definitions of $\sigma$-L-spaces in Kottwitz I and II
edited body; deleted 1 characters in body |
Mar 22 |
asked | Two different definitions of $\sigma$-L-spaces in Kottwitz I and II |
Jan 25 |
comment |
Constructible topology on schemes
@Ricky I think you are right. Huber uses spectral spaces in some proofs, but I think he doesn't do anything with them that could not be done without them. They are afaik not crucial to the theory of adic spaces. |
Jan 25 |
awarded | Teacher |
Jan 25 |
revised |
Constructible topology on schemes
deleted 48 characters in body |
Jan 25 |
answered | Constructible topology on schemes |
Jan 16 |
awarded | Scholar |
Jan 16 |
comment |
Structure of f.g. modules over a non-commutative ring
Thanks. That's what I'm looking for. |