bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | Barcelona | |
age | 28 | |
visits | member for | 3 years |
seen | yesterday | |
stats | profile views | 1,234 |
I'm a PhD student at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Jul 4 |
awarded | Yearling |
Mar 16 |
awarded | Enlightened |
Mar 16 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Mar 16 |
answered | Regarding the definition of S-flows over a category (given a monoid S) |
Mar 12 |
comment |
Lattice of subobjects of a particular coproduct
oh, you are right, if you want to post it as an answer I'd be happy to accept it. |
Mar 12 |
comment |
Lattice of subobjects of a particular coproduct
Sorry, I wanted to say by an automorphism of the ring. I mean, let $\phi:R\to R$ be an automorphism. Using $\phi$ you can see $R$ as an $R-R$-bimodule (differently than in the standard way) and you can tensor by that bimodule. |
Mar 12 |
asked | Lattice of subobjects of a particular coproduct |
Jan 29 |
awarded | Notable Question |
Dec 13 |
comment |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
Many thanks for your edit! The Noetherian case (when you have Kernels) was clear to me but I did not know how to proceed in the general case... |
Dec 13 |
accepted | Exactness of an additive left Kan extension |
Dec 12 |
comment |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
So do you claim that also the left adjoint between the categories of contravariant functors on $fp(R)$ and $fp(S)$ is exact provided $\phi_!$ is exact? I'm trying to prove this but I do not see how to prove that the slice category is directed... could you add some details for this other case? (If you prefer I can ask "officially" a new question) |
Nov 25 |
comment |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
@FilippoAlbertoEdoardo I'm not defining $F_!$ as a restriction, I define $F$ as a restriction. $F_!$ is the additive left Kan extension to $F$, in particular, while $F$ is a functor $fp(R)\to fp(S)$, $F_!$ goes from the category of additive functors on $fp(R)$ to Abelian groups, to the same category of presheaves over $fp(S)$. |
Nov 24 |
comment |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
You are right, $\mathbb Z\to \mathbb Q$ is flat (an Abelian group is flat if and only if it is torsion free). So $f^*$ cannot be restricted to a functor $fp(\mathbb Q)\to fp(\mathbb Z)$, but I am not asking that. I am just restricting $f_!$ and using its exactness (in your example it is clear that the image of a finitely presented module is a finite dimensional rational vector space). |
Nov 24 |
comment |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
OK sorry! Now I see the problem, there was a missprint (now corrected). $f_!$ had to be $\phi_!$ |
Nov 24 |
revised |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
added 3 characters in body |
Nov 24 |
comment |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
Well both $(\phi_!,\phi^*)$ and $(F_!,F^*)$ are adjunctions (where $(-)_!$ is used here to denote left adjoints and $(-)^*$ indicates right adjoints). The relation with $\phi$ is explained in the question. |
Nov 24 |
revised |
Exactness of an additive left Kan extension
edited title |
Nov 24 |
asked | Exactness of an additive left Kan extension |
Oct 20 |
accepted | Cocomplete but not complete abelian category |
Sep 24 |
awarded | Autobiographer |