Tom LaGatta
|
Registered User
|
I am a postdoc at the Courant Institute at NYU working in probability theory. You may find my pre-prints and publications here on the arXiv. With Janek Wehr, we have proved a shape theorem for random Riemannian metrics in a general setting. We have also submitted two articles on minimizing geodesics in this random setting. For an introduction to this topic, see the first section of our Geodesics paper. To control technical estimates for random Riemannian metrics, I have developed some results of continuous disintegrations for Gaussian processes. I am also interested in political science. With Smith and Bueno de Mesquita, we have developed a general model for voting behavior using game theory. With Andrew Little and Josh Tucker, we have a rational-choice model for the peaceful transfer of power after democratic elections. |
|
Apr 19 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
Apr 18 |
comment |
What is a Gaussian measure? Thanks, George. This pretty well answers my question, and at a deeper level of generality than I was asking at originally. |
|
Apr 16 |
revised |
What is a Gaussian measure? added 478 characters in body |
|
Apr 5 |
awarded | ● Popular Question |
|
Mar 24 |
comment |
Riesz representation theorem for vector-valued fields Thanks everybody for your helpful comments. |
|
Mar 24 |
comment |
Generalized Skorokhod spaces Here is a good survey on Skorokhod space and generalizations: kpbc.umk.pl/Content/39953/kievtopologies.pdf |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
Why can’t there be a general theory of nonlinear PDE? Here is a 7-page review of Partial Differential Relations by Dusa McDuff: projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/… |
|
Mar 20 |
answered | Open problems in PDEs, dynamical systems, mathematical physics |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
Open problems in PDEs, dynamical systems, mathematical physics This is a good question, but should be made Community Wiki. I see that there is already 1 vote to close. To users with closing power: I ask that you keep the question open for at least a few days to collect a few good answers for @AJGibson. If having a big list is annoying at that point, then we can close it. |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
Riesz representation theorem for vector-valued fields @Willie Wong: I don't know! I usually work with the real- or complex-valued case, in which case $V$ and $V^*$ are isomorphic. Thanks for raising the issue. @jbc: thanks for the reference, that will definitely be a good starting place for me. |
|
Mar 18 |
revised |
Riesz representation theorem for vector-valued fields added 58 characters in body |
|
Mar 18 |
asked | Riesz representation theorem for vector-valued fields |
|
Mar 15 |
comment |
Extending a Hilbert space isometrically @Jochen Wengenroth: I specifically made no additional assumptions on the Hilbert space nor the larger topological space $X$, such as separability or local convexity. Your remark on the separable case is interesting, and I thank you for making the point. For the second question, I mean to say, "when does F admit the structure of a Fréchet space?" Certainly, if its topology is completely metrizable, then the metric on $F$ will be an extension of the metric from $H$. |
|
Mar 15 |
revised |
Extending a Hilbert space isometrically added 25 characters in body |
|
Mar 15 |
asked | Extending a Hilbert space isometrically |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
$C^k$ topology of metrics Here is a reference on Cheeger-Gromov theory: arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0208079v2.pdf |
|
Mar 13 |
answered | How to triangulate a math reference? |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
origin of the notion of “network” in graph theory David Aldous defines a network to be "a graph with context-dependent extra structure." stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/Talks/… |
|
Mar 12 |
comment |
Symmetry group for the frame bundle of a G-space Thank you, @Ryan! |
|
Mar 12 |
comment |
Symmetry group for the frame bundle of a G-space @Ryan Budney, smooth actions are all I am concerned with; I edited the post. Thanks for the quick reply. Could you add a few more details and post that as an answer? |
|
Mar 12 |
revised |
Symmetry group for the frame bundle of a G-space added 9 characters in body |
|
Mar 12 |
asked | Symmetry group for the frame bundle of a G-space |
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces Indeed, this does answer the question. The Corollary to Theorem 2 states that there is no admissible norm on a non-separable Hilbert space. Since the support of the measure in affine space $X$ is the closure of the Cameron-Martin space corresponding to the covariance operator, the support of the measure must be separable. Consequently, there can be no Gaussian measure with full support in a non-separable affine space. Cheers. |
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces Thanks, @Anatoly Kochubei! Is is the case that in the non-separable setting, Gaussian measures are always concentrated on separable subspaces? It would seem reasonable that the answer is yes, which provides a negative answer to my original question. I was mulling over your second fact last night (the canonical Gaussian cylinder-set measure cannot be extended to a genuine measure), and am glad to see the reference. I'll take a look at Satô's paper and let you know if I've got any questions. |
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
Can random elements be defined in terms of a measure algebra? @Gerald: could you please summarize the image measure catastrophe in a comment? |
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces @Gerald (my apologies for misspelling your name before), a topological affine space is a topological vector space with the origin forgotten. Thankfully, the situation you hypothesize never occurs: there is always the zero functional. In that case, the only centered Gaussian measure is the Dirac point-mass concentrated on the origin. |
|
Mar 10 |
revised |
Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces added 233 characters in body |
|
Mar 10 |
comment |
Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces @Jacob Bell: I suspect that algebraic geometers are the mathematicians who think the most about general categories of spaces like topological affine spaces. I put the tag to get their input. |
|
Mar 10 |
comment |
Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces @Gerald Edgar: good point. We can always construct measures which has support on a finite-dimensional subspace of $X$. Let's add the condition that the support of the measure is the whole space. |
|
Mar 9 |
asked | Gaussian measures on non-separable spaces |
|
Mar 5 |
asked | The limiting behavior of geometric random walk |
|
Mar 5 |
comment |
What is a Gaussian measure? Thank you for the nice references, @Liviu Nicolaescu. |
|
Mar 4 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
Mar 3 |
asked | What is a Gaussian measure? |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Why do we choose the standard total order on the integers? Thank you, @Boris Novikov. This is an excellent fact to know. |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Why do we choose the standard total order on the integers? Thank you, @quid. This is a great answer to my question. |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Why do we choose the standard total order on the integers? Thank you, @Andreas Blass. In a sense, I should have anticipated this answer: if we insist on a total order, then it is not at all surprising that the standard order is the only one. |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Why do we choose the standard total order on the integers? @Ryan Budney, one mathematician's pedantry is another's research program. Thank you for sharing your observation on the Sharkovski order; it looks interesting. |
|
Feb 27 |
asked | Why do we choose the standard total order on the integers? |
|
Feb 27 |
asked | Is every bornological space measurable? |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Probability theory over noncommutative ring? @darij grinberg: can you share a perspective on entropy from the point of view of non-associative algebra? I'd love to hear more about its strangeness. |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
What is quantum Brownian motion? @Abdelmalek Abdesselam: to clarify, while the review has nothing do with a non-commutative probabilistic description of quantum Brownian motion, I think that non-comm. prob. theory might be one framework in which to precisely describe QBM. I make no claims that this approach is necessary but it may be useful. |
|
Feb 21 |
comment |
What is quantum Brownian motion? Good point, @Uwe Franz. I just found another MathOverflow question on the quantum Wiener process: mathoverflow.net/questions/15973/… |
|
Feb 21 |
asked | What is quantum Brownian motion? |
|
Feb 20 |
answered | Math Annotate Platform? |
|
Feb 15 |
comment |
What is a good example of a hyperspace where the base space is non-Hausdorff? @quid & @François: you both have enough reputation, so please feel free to edit the post to change the tags. |
|
Feb 14 |
revised |
What is a good example of a hyperspace where the base space is non-Hausdorff? edited tags |
|
Feb 14 |
asked | What is a good example of a hyperspace where the base space is non-Hausdorff? |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
Does every commutative monoid admit a translation-invariant measure? @Benjamin Steinberg: I am not familiar with the concept of minimal ideas in semigroups. What are those? Why are they obstructions to the existence of invariant measures? |
|
Feb 13 |
comment |
Does every commutative monoid admit a translation-invariant measure? That's odd that someone would downvote this. It's a great counterexample, and your argument is elegant. It's going to take me some time to reformulate my question so as to circumvent such obstructions. Thanks very much, @Benjamin Steinberg. |

