bio | website | sbseminar.wordpress.com |
---|---|---|
location | Bloomington, Indiana | |
age | 35 | |
visits | member for | 5 years, 8 months |
seen | 20 hours ago | |
stats | profile views | 6,597 |
Assistant Professor at Indiana University, working on tensor categories and their relationships to operator algebras and topology.
May 22 |
comment |
Distinct 2D RCFTs with the same underlying MTC
More simply, any even unimodular lattice gives a CFT whose MTC is trivial. |
May 17 |
comment |
For what $G$ is $Rep(D(S_3))_{ad}$ Grothendieck equivalent to $Rep(G)$?
I don't know of any references that are particularly better than Serre. |
May 16 |
answered | For what $G$ is $Rep(D(S_3))_{ad}$ Grothendieck equivalent to $Rep(G)$? |
May 7 |
comment |
Is the space of immersions of $S^n$ into $\mathbb R^{n+1}$ simply connected?
I think there's a fibration $\Omega^n(SO(n+1))\rightarrow X \rightarrow SO(n+1)$, where X is the space of unbased maps from $S^n$ to $SO(n+1)$. So you can look at the long exact sequence attached to this fibration to try to compute $\pi_1(X)$. Since $\pi_2(SO(n+1))$ vanishes, this only has five nontrivial terms. $\star \rightarrow \pi_{n+1}(SO(n+1)) \rightarrow \pi_1(X) \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_2 \rightarrow \pi_n(SO(n+1)) \rightarrow \pi_0(X) \rightarrow \star$. By Kervaire's table for $\pi_{n+1}(SO(n+1))$ you basically have the answer up to knowing how $\pi_1$ acts on $\pi_n$ for $SO(n+1)$ |
May 7 |
comment |
Is the space of immersions of $S^n$ into $\mathbb R^{n+1}$ simply connected?
Wait, doesn't the very next Johannson table (summarizing work of Kervaire) give the answer for larger n? $\mathbb{Z}_2^3, \mathbb{Z}_2^2, \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}_2, \mathbb{Z}_2, \mathbb{Z}_2^2, \mathbb{Z}_2, \mathbb{Z}_4, \mathbb{Z}$ depending on $n$ mod 8? |
May 7 |
comment |
Is the space of immersions of $S^n$ into $\mathbb R^{n+1}$ simply connected?
For n large, this is only two steps away from the stable range, so one could hope to get roughly the right answer by looking at the fiber sequence for SO twice. This question suggests that it's possible to calculate $\pi_n(\mathrm{SO}(n+1))$ exactly using it once. Using it again it seems to me you can get the answer up to at worst a factor of 2. |
May 7 |
comment |
Are the two-side TLJ subfactors maximal?
What you should have in mind here as an example of a similar flavor is $\mathbb{C} \subset M_2(\mathbb{C})$ sitting as the scalar matrices. The only intermediate $C^*$ algebra is the diagonal matrices, which has nontrivial center. This example looks exactly the same, except with gradings around that don't actually do anything important. |
May 7 |
answered | Are the two-side TLJ subfactors maximal? |
May 7 |
answered | Is the (hyperfinite) TLJ subfactor unique at fixed index (if it exists)? |
May 7 |
comment |
Is the (hyperfinite) TLJ subfactor unique at fixed index (if it exists)?
Do you mean subfactors of the hyperfinite? Otherwise what do you mean by unique, as you could just change the factor? If you do mean of the hyperfinite, then existence is open, so what you mean by uniqueness is again unclear (unique, if it exists?). |
May 6 |
comment |
Intuition behind the definition of quantum groups
I knew this story for SL(2) from Kassel's book, but I had been under the impression that there wasn't such a nice story for higher SL(n). But you seem to be saying there is such a story. Where can I read about it? |
May 6 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Mar 31 |
comment |
Nilpotence of the stable Hopf map via framed cobordism
The 12 seems to big to be easily geometrically explained, but it's enough to just show that the 3-torus is cobordant to $M \coprod M$ for some 3-manifold M. |
Mar 31 |
comment |
Nilpotence of the stable Hopf map via framed cobordism
@QiaochuYuan: You're right, I forgot that there were primes other than 2. (Or rather, I was looking at the picture for just the 2-part.) |
Mar 31 |
comment |
Nilpotence of the stable Hopf map via framed cobordism
A closely related fact, which quickly implies this one, is that the 3-torus is cobordant to a disjoint union of four copies of the 3-sphere (with its unit quaternion framing). Since that's just 3-dimensional it might be easier to see. |
Mar 31 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Mar 31 |
asked | Nilpotence of the stable Hopf map via framed cobordism |
Mar 25 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Mar 15 |
awarded | Good Answer |
Feb 22 |
awarded | Good Answer |