Ricardo Andrade
|
Registered User
|
|
|
40m |
comment |
Equivariant versus retractive spaces: a reference request On the other hand, the above article makes a reference to "Parametrized spaces model locally constant homotopy sheaves" (arxiv.org/abs/0706.2874) by Michael Shulman. Corollary 8.7 in this article is very close to the result that John Klein is asking for. |
|
1h |
comment |
Equivariant versus retractive spaces: a reference request It seems that article deals with unbased $G$-simplicial sets. |
|
8h |
revised |
fundamental class is the sum of simplices of triangulation of the manifold? corrected text |
|
May 18 |
comment |
Does the signature admit a homotopy coherent refinement? I am unfamiliar with L-theory. Nevertheless, I came across a recent article on the arxiv which seems related: "Commutativity properties of Quinn spectra" (arxiv.org/abs/1304.4759). It states in remark 1.4 that the Sullivan-Ranicki orientation from $MSTop$ to L-theory is a ring map of symmetric ring spectra, which I assume to mean a map of associative/$A_\infty$ monoids. Immediately before that remark, it is also stated that the authors are unaware of any previous result on the multiplicativity of the symmetric signature. Perhaps this article and the references therein will be helpful. |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Basic results with three or more hypotheses fixed link (replaced prime by %27); edited body |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Waldhausen $K$-theory for $G$-spaces added tag |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Is there an equivalent of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in the decision sciences ? fixed spelling |
|
May 16 |
revised |
4D TQFT from a modular tensor category corrected spelling |
|
May 16 |
awarded | ● Civic Duty |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Basic results with three or more hypotheses added 11 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Does there exist a space X whose suspension is homotopy equivalent to [0,1] rel ends but where X is not contractible? @Spiros: You're welcome. |
|
May 16 |
accepted | Does there exist a space X whose suspension is homotopy equivalent to [0,1] rel ends but where X is not contractible? |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Does there exist a space X whose suspension is homotopy equivalent to [0,1] rel ends but where X is not contractible? added 4 characters in body; deleted 10 characters in body |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Does there exist a space X whose suspension is homotopy equivalent to [0,1] rel ends but where X is not contractible? added 365 characters in body |
|
May 16 |
revised |
Does there exist a space X whose suspension is homotopy equivalent to [0,1] rel ends but where X is not contractible? added 2 characters in body |
|
May 16 |
answered | Does there exist a space X whose suspension is homotopy equivalent to [0,1] rel ends but where X is not contractible? |
|
May 9 |
comment |
higher order Noether identities I believe this question could use some broader, more visible tags, but I do not know what they should be. |
|
May 9 |
revised |
higher order Noether identities corrected spelling |
|
May 9 |
comment |
Algebraic topology in low regularity @Benoît: Indeed. Somehow, I forgot about the trace... Thank you very much for the clarification. |
|
May 9 |
comment |
Homotopy equivalences preserving structure @Oscar: Thank you for the clarification. I completely misunderstood the question. |
|
May 9 |
comment |
Algebraic topology in low regularity It is difficult to define the values on a set of measure zero of a "function" in an arbitrary Sobolev space. For example, the boundary of the disc, or countable sets (e.g. the values of a sequence) have Lebesgue measure zero in $\mathbb{R}^n$ for $n>1$. This happens because elements of Sobolev spaces are really equivalence classes of functions identified if they differ on a set of measure zero. As such, one has to be very careful to describe what one means by their values on a set of measure zero. |
|
May 9 |
revised |
Homotopy equivalences preserving structure added tag |
|
May 8 |
revised |
The classifying space of a gauge group slight fix of the second list |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Homotopy equivalences preserving structure I do not know of any references for this particular fact. However, as Jeff Strom indicates, if you have "sufficient" homotopy extension properties, then the diagram formed by the intersections of the $X_i$'s (respectively, the $Y_i$'s) should be cofibrant, and thus its colimit is equivalent to its homotopy colimit. Then the homotopy invariance of homotopy colimits in the Hurewicz/Strøm model structure on topological spaces shows that the map induced on the colimits (which are hopefully $X$ and $Y$) is a homotopy equivalence. The book by Hirschhorn contains these model categorical facts. |
|
May 8 |
comment |
What are some examples of weak ω-categories? @Jeremy: Thank you for the clarification. |
|
May 8 |
revised |
Explicit Lie May structure on cosimplicial DG Lie algebras corrected spelling, improved presentation |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Lyndon-Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence and cup products corrected spelling; added 10 characters in body; added 1 characters in body; edited tags |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set rearranged presentation |
|
May 5 |
revised |
When does an even-dimensional manifold fiber over an odd-dimensional manifold? fixed spelling error |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set improved formatting; deleted 5 characters in body |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set added 8 characters in body |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set added some motivation; added 111 characters in body; added 1 characters in body |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set added slight detail |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set edited title |
|
May 5 |
asked | Realizability of extensions of a free oriented matroid by an independent set |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Seeking errata for Berger-Moerdijk Axiomatic Homotopy Theory for Operads @David: I do not know whether it exists. I am not very familiar with model structures on categories of algebras over operads. I have only read about model structures on categories of algebras over cofibrant operads. Unfortunately, the commutative monoid operad is not at all cofibrant. My only other idea was to try transferring the model structure on simplicial commutative monoids to the category of topological commutative monoids. However, I could not easily see whether the conditions for the existence of the transferred model structure were verified. |
|
May 4 |
comment |
Seeking errata for Berger-Moerdijk Axiomatic Homotopy Theory for Operads I sincerely hope you get a good answer to your question. It happens all too often that errors are known, yet they are described nowhere. I just have a minor nitpick. Only a path connected commutative monoid in topological spaces need be weakly equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces. For example, the free commutative monoid on a space $X$ is the disjoint union of the spaces $X^{\times n}/\Sigma_n$ for $n\in\mathbb{N}$. These quotients will rarely be equivalent to products of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces: e.g. $(S^1)^{\times 2}/\Sigma_2 \simeq S^1 \vee S^1$. |
|
May 3 |
comment |
How does Berger-Moerdijk’s relative Boardman-Vogt work? @Gabriel: Thank you very much for this answer. Why did the authors not correct this in the article posted on the arxiv? |
|
May 3 |
revised |
Is this square a push-out square? fixed diagram |
|
May 2 |
comment |
What are some examples of weak ω-categories? @Jeremy: Thank you very much for the explanation. I just want to make sure I understand correctly what you mean by "higher identity morphism". Would that be a degenerate simplex (or globule, etc) in some multi-simplicial or globular approach? Or maybe it is a thin simplex in a complicial approach? Is that correct? Is there a better way to think about it? |
|
May 1 |
comment |
Does a *topological* manifold have an exhaustion by compact submanifolds with boundary? @Misha: Thank you very much for clarifying the references. I also agree with the sentiment that the Kirby-Siebenmann book is rather impenetrable. :( |
|
May 1 |
comment |
Does a *topological* manifold have an exhaustion by compact submanifolds with boundary? It seems that Quinn's theorem in "Topological transversality holds in all dimensions" allows for a proof of the result which does not directly invoke the existence of handle decompositions. First give a proper embedding $f:M\to\mathbb{R}^N$. Then use Quinn's result to deform $f$ to some embedding $f_i :M\to\mathbb{R}^n$ which is transverse to $\partial \overline{B_i(0)}$: according to Quinn, we may assume that $f$ and $f_i$ coincide outside a small neighbourhood of $\partial \overline{B_i(0)}$. Then $M$ is exhausted by the compact locally flat submanifolds $M_i=(f_i)^{-1}(\overline{B_i(0)})$. |
|
May 1 |
revised |
Does a *topological* manifold have an exhaustion by compact submanifolds with boundary? edited tags |
|
May 1 |
comment |
Does a *topological* manifold have an exhaustion by compact submanifolds with boundary? @Misha: That is a very informative answer. I have a question about the references. Is the result on the existence of handle decompositions for non-compact manifolds also in the book by Kirby and Siebenmann? Or does it follow from Freedman and Quinn's work? |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
What are some examples of weak ω-categories? @Jeremy Hahn: Can you describe what an invertible morphism in a (weak) $\omega$-category would look like in the first homotopy theory you consider? |
|
Apr 30 |
awarded | ● Fanatic |
|
Apr 28 |
comment |
Quotients of classifying spaces @unknown (google): You are welcome. It was a fun problem to work on. |
|
Apr 28 |
accepted | Quotients of classifying spaces |
|
Apr 28 |
revised |
Quotients of classifying spaces minor correction; added 2 characters in body |
|
Apr 28 |
revised |
Quotients of classifying spaces Added calculation of cohomology of the space; added 1 characters in body; added 11 characters in body |

