bio | website | mathnet.ru/php/… |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 3 years, 6 months |
seen | 5 hours ago | |
stats | profile views | 1,583 |
Jul 8 |
asked | Ideals in a subalgebra in $C^\infty(M)$ |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
This will be my handbook. Like Bible. :) |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
It is easy to prove of course, but it is not good to write this proof in a paper, or to use this result without reference. Ben, I don't like the formulation of this fact that Fulton and Harris give at p.444. This is not for normal mathematician, you must have some background in representation theory to recognize what I need in what they say. I believe there are texts with simpler formulations. And, by the way, I need also the constructions of real and imaginary parts, and their properties. Of course this is trivial, but I'd like to have a book on my table. |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
"a complex vector space is the complexification of a real vector space just when it bears a conjugate linear involution operator" -- I need this and the construction of involution on the dual space. But I think it's not nice to write this without reference. Or you mean that this is stated in the Fulton-Harris book? |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
No doubts, but which book to cite? |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
I think this is not what I need. They introduce the operation of taking complex conjugate vector, but only in the case when $X$ is a complexification of a given real vector space $Y$, not for an arbitrary complex vector space $X$... Or I missed something? |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
Remizov, actually... I deduce from this mistake, that you are Russian. Приятно познакомиться, сейчас погляжу. |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
@Paul Reynolds: Do you mean the book by J.F.Adams "Lectures on Lie groups"? Where does he write about this? |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
I do not understand. I need a source for reference, the book must contain a list of properties of this notion. |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
It doesn't matter, of course, on which discipline the book is. John Roe's book, do you mean this one: folk.uio.no/rognes/higson/Book.pdf ? |
Jul 7 |
comment |
A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered
You don't remember details? Title, author? |
Jul 7 |
asked | A textbook on linear algebra where involutions on linear spaces are considered |
Jul 7 |
awarded | Fanatic |
Jun 20 |
comment |
Is the Mendeleev table explained in quantum mechanics?
Ben, you should explain yourself, this sounds strong: "The answer to 1 is yes". And this also: "physical theories aren't axiomatic systems". What about classical mechanics? Or probability theory? |
Jun 18 |
accepted | Is the Mendeleev table explained in quantum mechanics? |
Jun 7 |
comment |
Defining a topology in the Power Set
A remark to the construction of Dan Ramras: it becomes much more interesting if you endow the two point space, let us denote it by $2=\{0,1\}$, with the connected topology, where $\{0\}$ is closed and $\{1\}$ is open. Then the pre-image of $\{0\}$ is closed in $T$, and the pre-image of $\{1\}$ is open. And the set $2^T$ of maps $f:T\to 2$ is in one-to-one correspondense with the set of all closed (/open) subsets in $T$, and you can endow $2^T$ with different interesting topologies. So actually, I think you should understand first, whether you need all subsets in $T$ or, say, just closed ones. |
Jun 3 |
revised |
Naive question about the representation theory of algebraic groups and hopf algebras
deleted 2 characters in body |
May 23 |
comment |
Homomorphisms preserving constant functions
You should explain your notations (and the notion of homomorphism). |
May 6 |
comment |
Is rigour just a ritual that most mathematicians wish to get rid of if they could?
Fedja, too venomously in the last paragraph. In my opinion. |
May 5 |
comment |
A sufficient condition for a probability measure to have compact support
No, actually, I don't know... |