Vidit Nanda
|
Registered User
|
Formerly Vel Nias |
|
1d |
comment |
What fraction of n-point sets in the unit ball have diameter 1? Thanks for this, Ricardo. I am still parsing your answer, I'll get back to you once I understand this. |
|
Jun 14 |
revised |
What fraction of n-point sets in the unit ball have diameter 1? added two mathcals to avoid duplicate notation for B |
|
Jun 14 |
comment |
Can we invert barycentric subdivision? Thanks a ton, Ricardo. I have accepted your answer for now so that my question doesn't keep getting popped to the front page. I hope you will understand if I undo this acceptance in the event of a more precise answer from you or someone else. |
|
Jun 14 |
asked | What fraction of n-point sets in the unit ball have diameter 1? |
|
Jun 2 |
comment |
Can we invert barycentric subdivision? Ricardo: I think you should post this as an answer because it is as close as we are likely to get to one. I will accept so that this question doesn't keep appearing on the front page. This has the added benefit of tormenting residential skeptic Ryan :) |
|
Jun 2 |
comment |
Can we invert barycentric subdivision? thank you for the reference, Ricardo. It is a strange characterization: no 1-manifolds, no simplices and no boundaries of simplices!!?? |
|
May 31 |
revised |
Can we invert barycentric subdivision? added 183 characters in body; added 73 characters in body |
|
May 31 |
comment |
Can we invert barycentric subdivision? Fernando: thanks for this reference! Ryan: see Fernando's link, it contradicts what you appear to be saying. Henr: doesn't an affirmative answer to 3 force an affirmative answer to 1? |
|
May 31 |
asked | Can we invert barycentric subdivision? |
|
May 29 |
comment |
Biggest ball included in an intersection of balls Regarding the first (okay, second) sentence: assume $d = 2$. Certainly, we can construct $4$ balls whose intersection contains all the centers, but so that the intersection of any $3$ is strictly larger than the intersection of all $4$. Therefore, the largest ball which fits into the intersection of $3$ will almost surely not fit into the intersection of all $4$. How can we use Helly's theorem to just restrict attention to $d+1$ balls?? |
|
May 28 |
comment |
A notion of a ‘coarse’, parametrized dimension of an object, where the parameter determines how finely we can distinguish (say) a very thin rod from a line ithmath, that's about right. Of course, the map $f: M \to |K|$ from the definition need not be a "contraction" in the strict sense (of strong deformation retraction): it is just any continuous map with control on sizes of point inverses. And yes, the fact that you can construct a triple $(K,f,\epsilon)$ for some choice of $n$ only tells you that the macroscopic dimension is $\leq n$ at your scale $\epsilon$. |
|
May 27 |
accepted | A notion of a ‘coarse’, parametrized dimension of an object, where the parameter determines how finely we can distinguish (say) a very thin rod from a line |
|
May 27 |
answered | A notion of a ‘coarse’, parametrized dimension of an object, where the parameter determines how finely we can distinguish (say) a very thin rod from a line |
|
May 23 |
answered | How many triangulations of the genus $g$ surface on $n$ vertices? |
|
May 22 |
comment |
Does this qualify as “self plagiarism” or something? If all your work is in one sub-field, it would be surprising to not see isomorphic background sections for all your papers. It's only cause for concern if you are claiming a new contribution each time or something, which does not sound like the case. I would recommend citing some of your earlier papers along with other related material at the outset of your latest background section, with a sentence like "the following definitions and results are similar to those in [5,6,8,12,16]" |
|
May 20 |
comment |
Finitely generated monoids are finitely presented? Why is this an answer instead of an up-vote of Tom Church's comment from... 3 years ago? |
|
May 13 |
comment |
“monotone” homotopy? What is "the" Hausdorff axiom? What does your ncatlab link have to do with that axiom? What do the axiom and this link have to do with the original problem? |
|
May 13 |
comment |
“monotone” homotopy? I have not seen this before, but you may be interested in looking up "controlled homotopy theory". |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Category with a “metric” for arrow composition Yet another unbalanced parenthesis :( |
|
May 4 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
Uniqueness of fixed points for rational transformations You want to know if $T\circ T$ has a unique fixed point. If $T$ fails to have a unique fixed point (it must have at least one) then the search is hopeless. So, my question was: have you made any progress on solving the much easier-looking problem: does $T$ have a single fixed point? |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
Uniqueness of fixed points for rational transformations Isn't every fixed point of $T$ also a fixed point of $T\circ T$? Why not just ask about uniqueness of the fixed point of $T$ (which must also exist by Brouwer's theorem)? |
|
Apr 29 |
awarded | ● Citizen Patrol |
|
Apr 24 |
awarded | ● Nice Answer |
|
Apr 22 |
comment |
Transformation between Left and Right Kan Extensions Andreas, should be fixed now I think. Michal, thank you for commenting but I am unfamiliar with your notation: what are those integral signs? |
|
Apr 22 |
revised |
Transformation between Left and Right Kan Extensions addressed errors, etc pointed out in comments |
|
Apr 22 |
asked | Transformation between Left and Right Kan Extensions |
|
Apr 20 |
comment |
Is this a Banach space? What is $x$ in the definition of $X$? |
|
Apr 20 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
Hall’s Marriage Theorem and intervals I haven't seen this generalization before, but you should make sure it doesn't follow obviously from something like exercise III.4.6 in Bourbaki's set theory (I don't think it does, but it's too early in the morning). |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
Fixed point theorems For a finite $S$ it is presumably easier to count the fixed points of $f$ "by hand". Of course, this old-school method doesn't quite give you Burnside's Lemma... |
|
Apr 10 |
awarded | ● Nice Answer |
|
Apr 10 |
revised |
Fixed point theorems added homotopy invariance |
|
Apr 10 |
revised |
Fixed point theorems Added Heitsch survey |
|
Apr 10 |
answered | Fixed point theorems |
|
Apr 10 |
accepted | Testing simplicial complexes for shellability |
|
Apr 10 |
answered | Testing simplicial complexes for shellability |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Is the space of diffeomorphisms homotopy equivalent to a CW-complex? Peter: thank you for addressing the compact open topology. Also, +1 for "horrendibly". |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Is the space of diffeomorphisms homotopy equivalent to a CW-complex? Peter, isn't the Whitney topology very different from the compact-open topology which Ricardo is asking about? |
|
Apr 7 |
accepted | Combinatorial distance between simplicial complexes |
|
Apr 6 |
comment |
Combinatorial distance between simplicial complexes Wlodzimiers, the vertex labels in the drawing are not part of the input data. Basically, you have no idea when one simplex that you would like to remove from $K_1$ is actually isomorphic to another simplex from $K_2$ or not without already knowing the space of all partial simplicial maps $K_1 \to K_2$. To convince yourself that the problem is indeed computationally hard, start with Joseph's picture but remove all the vertex labelings! |
|
Apr 5 |
comment |
Combinatorial distance between simplicial complexes Joseph, I am now confused about the calculation in your example. What happened to the 2-simplex $cef$ which is present in $K_2$ but not in $K_1$, but did not contribute to the distance? |
|
Apr 5 |
answered | Combinatorial distance between simplicial complexes |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Extending simplicial complex to a manifold What do you mean when you say "a simplicial complex contained in $S$"? Do you mean $|X|$ can be embedded into $S$? |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Homotopy equvalence from contractibility of fiber. Andy: this is how I have seen (and stated) this theorem also, but does one really need to say "surjective"? The empty set does not have the homotopy type of a point, does it? |
|
Apr 1 |
comment |
Does the metric space of compact metric spaces satisfy the binary intersection property? Thanks, Vladimir! |
|
Mar 20 |
comment |
Is there a general theory of fiber theorems? Ricardo, I'm definitely going to take a look at Lacher's paper. Thank you again. |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Is there a general theory of fiber theorems? Thanks! This definitely answers the concrete question! |
|
Mar 19 |
awarded | ● Nice Question |
|
Mar 19 |
comment |
Algebraic Morse theory @Leon: no worries, glad to help. I wasn't kidding in my answer, it is really cool to see people (especially grad students) seriously studying algebraic or discrete Morse theory! |

