bio | website | ohio.edu/people/eisworth |
---|---|---|
location | Ohio University | |
age | 47 | |
visits | member for | 3 years, 4 months |
seen | Jan 9 at 21:17 | |
stats | profile views | 1,985 |
Just your run-of-the-mill math professor/dad/set-theorist...
Jan 10 |
awarded | Nice Question |
Dec 10 |
awarded | Curious |
Dec 9 |
asked | Semiproper but not proper |
Nov 12 |
comment |
Ideas behind Gitik's solution of PCF conjecture
Good luck with this! This proof is one that needs to be clarified and assimilated ASAP, because it opens up so many possibilities to answer open questions. |
Sep 28 |
awarded | Yearling |
Sep 17 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Aug 31 |
answered | $RUCar^{V}$-semiproperness implies properness |
Aug 19 |
comment |
Ideas behind Gitik's solution of PCF conjecture
I asked this question of many people at Oberwolfach. The answers were the same as Asaf's comment. ;) |
Aug 15 |
answered | Iteration of Proper Forcing and Support of Master Conditions |
Jun 1 |
answered | The independence number |
May 17 |
awarded | Custodian |
May 17 |
reviewed | Approve Equicontinuity and $L^2$ convergence imply uniform convergence |
May 17 |
reviewed | Approve Is it ever a good idea to use Keisler-Shelah to show elementary equivalence? |
May 7 |
comment |
Preservation of ultrafilters by Sacks forcing
It might be interesting to see if every hlt-ultrafilter is RK-above a P-point. Andreas Blass may know the answer to such questions! |
May 6 |
awarded | Nice Question |
May 5 |
comment |
Namba forcing and semiproperness
The question of whether SCC implies Namba semiproperness seems interesting, though, and not unreasonable! |
May 5 |
answered | Preservation of ultrafilters by Sacks forcing |
May 5 |
comment |
Namba forcing and semiproperness
Philip: I know he shows that the strong Chang conjecture is a consequence of Namba semimproperness in Theorem XII.2.5 of the book. Is SCC actually equivalent? |
May 4 |
asked | Namba forcing and semiproperness |
Apr 4 |
comment |
regularity of ultrafilters
In the Kanamori-Magidor "Evolution of Large Cardinal Axioms" paper, the question is mentioned as still open. |