Reputation
1,450
Next privilege 2,000 Rep.
Edit questions and answers
Badges
9 15
Newest
 Necromancer
Impact
~37k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 187 votes cast
1d
comment Faltings height on pair $(\mathcal X,\mathcal D)$
Could you explain more precisely what you have in mind?
Jan
10
comment Which sheaves satisfy cohomological purity?
About this, see middle of p. 124 of the book by Kiehl-Weissauer on Weil Conjectures, Perverse sheaves etc.
Sep
13
awarded  Necromancer
Aug
22
awarded  Yearling
Aug
3
comment Is this kind of scheme integral?
For smthg related to your question, see Prop 4.3.8 p. 137 in Liu book (this shows eg that if you assume that $X$ is flat over $R$ and $X_\eta$ is integral, then so is $X$).
Jun
25
accepted CM abelian varieties over the rationals
Jun
25
comment CM abelian varieties over the rationals
Nice answer... thank you for that. I wonder why this argument does not appear in any of the usual references for the theory of complex multiplication (unless I missed something ?).
Jun
24
asked CM abelian varieties over the rationals
Jun
17
comment Projective bundle formula
(you means $X={\bf P}(E)$ in your formula) If $X$ is smooth and proper, then by Hodge decomposition the formula is the same as for singular cohomology (see Griffiths-Harris, p. 606). If $X$ is smooth but not necessarily proper then the cohomology ring might be infinite-dimensional.
May
16
comment Reference request: Cohomology of Elliptic Curves
Why is the image of $\mu_\nu$ a normal subgroup of ${\rm Gal}(K^{\rm ab}|K)$ ? Sorry if I missed something obvious.
Apr
2
comment Connected vs Irreducible Subvarieties
What about normality ?
Feb
25
comment A proper smooth surface is projective
Several classical references are given on II, §4, p. 105 of Hartshorne's book.
Jan
25
comment References for general Hasse-Weil zeta function
I do not know any other coherent reference than "facteurs locaux"....
Jan
5
comment automorphisms of local rings vs local change of coordinates
I think you haven't actually stated which two objects you want to coincide.
Dec
14
comment Quotient of a (non-linear) algebraic group by a closed subgroup
Here is another reference: Raynaud, 'Passage au quotient par une relation d'équivalence plate', Proceedings of a conference on local fields (Driebergen, 1967), p. 82 Ex. a) (i).
Nov
29
comment Fermat's last theorem over larger fields
Sorry, your are right, Mazur's conjecture does not quite cover your question (but it gives a partial answer). The conjecture in Zarhin-Parshin corresponds precisely to what follows from Mordell-Lang + Mazur's conjecture.
Nov
28
comment Fermat's last theorem over larger fields
See also Zarhin-Parshin, "Finiteness theorems...", p. 92 for a related conjecture (also made by Mazur).
Nov
26
comment How to see that this pairing of line bundles is multiplicative?
Do you want a canonical isomorphism (inv. under base-change) ? Or would you be happy with any isomorphism ?
Nov
19
accepted On a proposition in Hartshorne's paper “Ample vector bundles on curves”
Nov
16
awarded  Nice Question