bio | website | |
---|---|---|

location | ||

age | ||

visits | member for | 3 years, 6 months |

seen | 15 hours ago | |

stats | profile views | 1,165 |

undergrad with dumb inquiries

Sep 24 |
awarded | Autobiographer |

Jul 2 |
awarded | Curious |

Apr 13 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
Sure, i'll do that in a bit |

Apr 13 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
added 39 characters in body |

Apr 2 |
awarded | Disciplined |

Mar 30 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
deleted 52 characters in body |

Mar 30 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
edited body |

Mar 30 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
added 43 characters in body |

Mar 30 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |

Mar 28 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
edited title |

Mar 28 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
edited tags |

Mar 26 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
deleted 29 characters in body |

Mar 25 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
can you please elaborate on your choice of $T$? what does far apart mean more precisely? thanks in advance |

Feb 21 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
deleted 11 characters in body |

Feb 20 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
actually: the line graph of your example is a subdivision of a binary tree! so it's not really a counterexample |

Feb 19 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
can you post an answer with a proof? :) |

Feb 19 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
that's nice; can we say something about the induced subgraphs however? it pretty much looks like there's no other bad graphs |

Feb 18 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
Sorry, you start with a triangle and add an edge to every vertex of degree one? |

Feb 17 |
revised |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
added 18 characters in body |

Feb 17 |
comment |
Big binary tree as an induced subgraph
Sorry, I edited the question - I meant something else. You are of course right for what I initially wrote. |