Impact
~7k
people reached
- 0 posts edited
- 0 helpful flags
- 11 votes cast
Oct
3 |
awarded | Popular Question |
Sep
24 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
Sep
8 |
comment |
This weaker version of CR-structure: is it studied somewhere
@BenMcKay:Yes they are. |
Sep
5 |
revised |
This weaker version of CR-structure: is it studied somewhere
Asked a new question |
Sep
2 |
asked | This weaker version of CR-structure: is it studied somewhere |
Jul
2 |
awarded | Curious |
May
22 |
awarded | Nice Question |
May
10 |
answered | How to prove this Weitzenbock formula? |
May
9 |
comment |
How to prove this Weitzenbock formula?
@HenryT.Horton: (4.14) is for $\Omega^{0,0}(E)$. I managed to prove (4.14), but not the one I am confused about. |
May
8 |
revised |
How to prove this Weitzenbock formula?
explain the notation |
May
8 |
revised |
How to prove this Weitzenbock formula?
added 68 characters in body |
May
8 |
revised |
How to prove this Weitzenbock formula?
deleted 127 characters in body |
May
8 |
asked | How to prove this Weitzenbock formula? |
May
4 |
comment |
Factor of 2 In the Definition of Metric Contact Structure
I agree with Brendan on the two definitions of $d$: I found at the bottom of page 62, Blair wrote down $d\eta$ formula. I feel that a clear list of convention should be provided at the very beginning of the book. Thanks! |
May
4 |
accepted | Factor of 2 In the Definition of Metric Contact Structure |
Apr
20 |
asked | Factor of 2 In the Definition of Metric Contact Structure |
Apr
13 |
comment |
3d-analog of “every 2d oriented manifold is complex”
Thanks for replying and the algebra is quite interesting. But as you stated it's not an analog I'm looking for. Hope there will be some other suggestions. |
Apr
9 |
revised |
3d-analog of “every 2d oriented manifold is complex”
added 5 characters in body |
Apr
9 |
revised |
3d-analog of “every 2d oriented manifold is complex”
added 118 characters in body |
Apr
9 |
asked | 3d-analog of “every 2d oriented manifold is complex” |