MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).

Vladimir S Matveev

698
Reputation
598 views
Is this your account?

Registered User 

Name Vladimir S Matveev
Member for 2 years
Seen Jun 4 at 19:31
Website
Location Jena/Gemrany
Age 42
Jun
3
awarded  Critic
May
19
comment Surface locally isometric to a sphere.
The "Riemmanian" version of the question is not that trivial IMHO. A possible proof: the gauss curvature of the surface is constant because it is preserved by the isometries. It is positive since every compact surface must have a point where the curvature is positive. Then, the surface is diffeomorph to the sphere or to the projective plane. The latter can not be imbedded in $R^3$ (and the proof of this fact is much easier under the assumption that the curvature is positive) so the surface is the sphere. Now, by the Alexandrov theorem the sphere is standartly imbedded.
Apr
25
awarded  Necromancer
Apr
19
awarded  Yearling
Apr
12
revised Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows
edited body
Apr
12
answered Intuition for Levi-Civita connection via Hamiltonian flows
Mar
29
accepted Alternative Almost Complex Structures
Mar
26
answered Alternative Almost Complex Structures
Feb
21
comment Projectively equivalent connections
The classical sources on projectively equivalent connections are Levi-Civita: Sulle trasformazioni delle equazioni dinamiche. Ann. di Mat., serie 2a. 24, 55–300 (1896). English transl. in Regular and Chaotic Dynamics 14, 580–614 (2009) and Thomas, T. Y.: On the projective and equi-projective geo metries of paths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 11, 199–203 (1925) In recent time projectively equivalent connections were actively studied in the framework of parabolic geometries; see the survey M. Eastwood, Notes on projective differential geometry, arXiv:0806.3998 Everything IMHO
Feb
20
accepted Projectively equivalent connections
Feb
19
answered Projectively equivalent connections
Jan
26
answered Tensor contraction and Covariant Derivative