bio | website | |
---|---|---|
location | ||
age | ||
visits | member for | 5 years, 5 months |
seen | Apr 24 at 2:07 | |
stats | profile views | 138 |
Favorite exercise/sport: mountain biking, Favorite software: vim, Favorite board game: chess, Favorite academic topic: math, Favorite movie: big lebowski Favorite programming language: C++, Favorite OS: linux, Favorite bike: Specialized Trail SX, Favorite topic in programming: algorithms
Apr 21 |
awarded | Scholar |
Apr 21 |
accepted | Generating-functions: is there a relationship between a generating function and the corresponding squared generating function |
Apr 21 |
comment |
Generating-functions: is there a relationship between a generating function and the corresponding squared generating function
Know this is quite late, but thank you haha. |
Oct 10 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
May 28 |
awarded | Popular Question |
May 20 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
Nov 28 |
awarded | Commentator |
Nov 28 |
comment |
Singular value decomposition over finite fields?
You can still use an unordered field, you just need that the inner-product maps to non-negative reals. |
Nov 28 |
answered | Thorough Introduction to Singular Value Decomposition |
Nov 28 |
answered | A random walk matrix has eigenvalue 1 with multiplicty 1 - why? |
Nov 20 |
comment |
Computing the maximum salary
This wouldn't work for 2 people would it? |
Nov 20 |
comment |
Computing the maximum salary
I like this question, hehe, simple but interesting. |
Nov 20 |
comment |
Infinite Ramsey theorem with infinitely many colours
Kristal, I may be missing something, but when you say countably finite isn't that redundant, I mean all finite sets are countable by definition no? |
Nov 20 |
comment |
How to compute the rank of a matrix?
haha I think its fine to have a misleading title as long as its all fun and games. |
Nov 19 |
answered | Ways to Synthesize Topics in Linear Algebra |
Nov 11 |
comment |
Math History Question about the exponential function
"entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity", thats all. |
Nov 9 |
comment |
Math History Question about the exponential function
thanks for the answer, I suspect your reasoning is correct. Correct me if I am wrong but f continuous on isn't a sufficient condition. For example, take $f(x) = 1 \text{ for } x \in \mathbb{Q}$ and $f(x)=0 \text{ for } x \in \mathbb{R} \ setminus \mathbb{Q} $ then that method would imply f(x) is 1 everywhere, since f(x) is continuous on the rationals |
Nov 9 |
awarded | Supporter |
Nov 9 |
comment |
Math History Question about the exponential function
Ever hear of occam's razor Harald ? :P |
Nov 9 |
asked | Math History Question about the exponential function |