656 reputation
511
bio website www2.imperial.ac.uk/~cdl10
location London
age 26
visits member for 3 years, 9 months
seen 22 hours ago

Dec
15
accepted “Weight-mondoromy” for open varieties
Dec
12
revised “Weight-mondoromy” for open varieties
edited body
Dec
12
asked “Weight-mondoromy” for open varieties
Nov
13
answered Algebraization isomorphism, formal existence, mod p
Oct
17
awarded  Yearling
Oct
17
comment The topology on the Robba ring
Yes, I wondered about that but I don't think so. There will be elements of $\mathcal{R}_K$ for which that norm is not defined for any $r$, since we require convergence on some semi-open annulus $p^{-r}\leq t <1$ rather than the closed annulus $p^{-r}\leq t\leq 1$.
Oct
17
asked The topology on the Robba ring
Jul
2
awarded  Curious
Jul
1
asked Complexes of arithmetic $\mathcal{D}$-modules with Frobenius structure
Nov
8
awarded  Nice Question
Nov
8
accepted Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
Nov
8
answered Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
Nov
7
revised Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
added 263 characters in body
Nov
7
comment Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
No, I don't think so. By cohomology, I really mean $Hom_{D}(1,V[i])$, where $D$ is either of the triangulated categories, so $t$-structures don't come into it at all. I'll edit the question to make this clearer.
Nov
6
revised Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
added 16 characters in body
Nov
6
comment Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
Sorry, which particular section of the thesis did you have in mind? It seems to be talking about pro-finite homotopy types to me...
Nov
5
asked Pro-algebraic versus continuous Galois cohomology, and schematic homotopy types
Oct
11
comment “Extended” Weil Cohomology Theories
Ah, I didn't know about Bloch-Ogus, that might be pretty much what I'm looking for.
Oct
10
comment “Extended” Weil Cohomology Theories
No, their notion of a mixed Weil cohomology theory doesn't say anything about compact supports or Poincaré duality. It follows from their results that given a Weil cohomology theory, all the extra stuff pops out (by realising the motivic version), but it doesn't form part of their definition of a mixed Weil cohomology theory.
Oct
10
asked “Extended” Weil Cohomology Theories