bio  website  

location  Québec  
age  
visits  member for  4 years, 5 months 
seen  14 hours ago  
stats  profile views  1,729 
23h

accepted  On the geometry of roots of a sum of complex linear fractions 
23h

comment 
On the geometry of roots of a sum of complex linear fractions
Thanks for the reference. It seems difficult though to obtain a geometrical interpretation from this lemma. For what I want, I think Theorem 8.2, p.32, is more interesting. 
2d

revised 
On the geometry of roots of a sum of complex linear fractions
edited tags 
2d

revised 
On the geometry of roots of a sum of complex linear fractions
added 342 characters in body 
2d

asked  On the geometry of roots of a sum of complex linear fractions 
Mar 26 
comment 
The Riemann mapping theorem via extremal problems
What I am interested in here is just the particular case $n=1$ of Ahlfor's theorem, without any assumption on the boundary of the domain. 
Mar 25 
comment 
The Riemann mapping theorem via extremal problems
Yes indeed, the Riemann mapping theorem is a direct consequence of Ahlfor's theorem on the properties of the Ahlfors function on $n$connected domains. However, as you mention, every proof I know of this theorem uses analyticity of the boundary, which requires the Riemann mapping theorem. So this does not answer the question. The remark about the Bergman kernel is very interesting, I will look it up. Thank you. 
Mar 24 
revised 
The Riemann mapping theorem via extremal problems
deleted 37 characters in body 
Mar 19 
revised 
The Riemann mapping theorem via extremal problems
deleted 35 characters in body; edited tags 
Mar 18 
revised 
The Riemann mapping theorem via extremal problems
added 10 characters in body; edited tags 
Mar 17 
asked  The Riemann mapping theorem via extremal problems 
Feb 17 
comment 
$ 2f^{'}(0) = \sup_{z, w \in D} f(z)f(w)$ if and only if $f$ is linear
@AlexandreEremenko : After Theorem 1.3 of the paper mentioned in my answer, it is written The main contribution of the LandauToeplitz paper is perhaps its elucidation of the extremal case. 
Feb 16 
answered  $ 2f^{'}(0) = \sup_{z, w \in D} f(z)f(w)$ if and only if $f$ is linear 
Feb 7 
comment 
Examples of common false beliefs in mathematics.
@MartinBrandenburg : What does it mean for an assumption to be incorrect or correct? 
Jan 5 
comment 
Arakelian's approximation theorem
I just took a quick look at the paper and it seems that the proof only uses the fact that the modulus of the integral is small, not that the integral of the modulus is small. Perhaps it is a typo. 
Nov 11 
comment 
About the Riemann integrability of composite functions
I just saw this very old question, but I'm not sure I understand your doubt about the existence of $g$ : Can't you just take $g(x)$ the distance from $x$ to a Cantor set $C$ of positive measure? 
Nov 8 
comment 
Integral and conformal mappings II
I think user36162 is right. I don't see why $I_n$ would diverge since $f_n'$ must be bounded in $D$. 
Nov 8 
comment 
Uniform convergence of conformal mappings
You're right of course, I was confused and my answer was wrong. Thank you for pointing it out. Great answer, +1 ! 
Nov 7 
comment 
Uniform convergence of conformal mappings
@PietroMajer : Surely this is what is meant. I assumed it in my answer. 
Nov 3 
comment 
A question on Koebe theorem
@ToddTrimble : Thank you! 