bio | website | cs.ox.ac.uk/people/… |
---|---|---|
location | Oxford, United Kingdom | |
age | 51 | |
visits | member for | 4 years, 8 months |
seen | yesterday | |
stats | profile views | 2,306 |
May 24 |
reviewed | Leave Closed Determine if you can build a polygon from segments |
May 24 |
reviewed | Close How does one express a Lagrangian via differential forms? |
May 21 |
reviewed | Approve Morse number of the Poincaré homology sphere |
May 21 |
awarded | Reviewer |
May 21 |
reviewed | Close Will this be a case of self plagiarism or will it annoy the referee? |
May 21 |
comment |
Will this be a case of self plagiarism or will it annoy the referee?
Yet another option is to include the parts with proofs from P1 as an appendix to P2. An appendix is meant to be for referees. As P1 is not yet published, this seems the most appropriate. |
May 21 |
reviewed | Leave Open Are congruence subgroups of the modular group finitely presented? |
May 20 |
reviewed | Leave Open What criteria are to determine if two projective varieties are projectively equivalent? |
May 19 |
comment |
Looking for reference or proof to some facts stated on Anand Pillay's book
if your 2-dimensional closed sets have at least 3 elements then one doesn't need any group actions and infiniteness, it's just pure synthetic geometry to show that you sill get an affine or projective geometry. |
May 19 |
comment |
Cardinality of non-integer points in the translation of the Minkowski sum of convex hull.
counting integer points in $mP+nQ$ is quite famous question, related to mixed volumes. Perhaps you can use it to get $|S|$... |
May 19 |
comment |
Looking for reference or proof to some facts stated on Anand Pillay's book
you need infiniteness to avoid a sporadic example related to the Mathieu group $M_{22}$, I suppose. Well, I don't know how to deal with the case of 2-dimensional closed sets (a.k.a. lines) being of size 2, and locally being an infinite projective plane. |
May 19 |
comment |
Looking for reference or proof to some facts stated on Anand Pillay's book
2.1.11 is also a result that is very old, at least in geometric terms (I don't know what an "infinite homogeneous" means though). Does it mean that the rank is infinite? |
May 19 |
comment |
Looking for reference or proof to some facts stated on Anand Pillay's book
2.1.12 is a classical result in projective geometry, any good book should have it. e.g. see math.stackexchange.com/questions/549099/… for a list of books. |
May 19 |
reviewed | Close Is any F-stable maximal torus contained in some F-stable Borel subgroup? |
May 19 |
comment |
Is any F-stable maximal torus contained in some F-stable Borel subgroup?
I'm voting to close this question as it has been answered in the comments |
May 18 |
reviewed | Close Intrinsic definition of arc length |
May 16 |
comment |
Extreme points of convex hull of Minkowski sum
it seems you do not understand what conv(X) is. |
May 16 |
comment |
Extreme points of convex hull of Minkowski sum
you are not reading it right. |
May 16 |
comment |
Extreme points of convex hull of Minkowski sum
@Cusp : if $Q$ is a point $a$ then $P+Q$ is just $P$ shifted by the vector $a$, and the vertices of $P+Q$ are the vertices of $P$ shifted by $a$, and this is what I claim. |
May 16 |
comment |
Extreme points of convex hull of Minkowski sum
pictures speak for themselves here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_addition |