bio | website | plusepsilon.de |
---|---|---|

location | Uni Hamburg | |

age | 30 | |

visits | member for | 4 years, 8 months |

seen | Jan 31 at 13:20 | |

stats | profile views | 8,530 |

Jun 6 |
awarded | Nice Question |

May 17 |
awarded | Popular Question |

Apr 15 |
awarded | Nice Question |

Apr 6 |
awarded | Nice Answer |

Mar 17 |
awarded | Popular Question |

Dec 19 |
awarded | Popular Question |

Nov 1 |
awarded | Necromancer |

Oct 28 |
awarded | Yearling |

Sep 30 |
awarded | Explainer |

Sep 19 |
comment |
Are there any simple, interesting consequences to motivate the local Langlands correspondence?
@PaulSiegel: I have edited the question. I was probably thinking "global understanding requires local understanding". That is not necessarily so, I guess. |

Sep 19 |
revised |
Are there any simple, interesting consequences to motivate the local Langlands correspondence?
added 24 characters in body |

Aug 17 |
awarded | Nice Question |

Aug 7 |
awarded | Popular Question |

Jul 2 |
awarded | Inquisitive |

Jul 2 |
awarded | Curious |

Jun 30 |
comment |
Eisenstein series over a definite division algebra
Ah okay, I see my mistake. I was thinking $GL(1)$ over a division algebra, you are considering $GL(2)$. Moeglin-Waldspurger do not consider this setting in their book? |

Jun 28 |
awarded | Popular Question |

Jun 27 |
comment |
Eisenstein series over a definite division algebra
Please help me to understand what the cusp is. I recall that quaternion division algebras give rise to compact quotients, hence no cusps and Eisenstein series. The trace formula becomes simple and one gets the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence with forms with at least two square-integrable components. |

Jun 19 |
comment |
Complex zeros of $\zeta'(s)/\zeta(s) + \zeta'(1-s)/\zeta(1-s) $ = simpler expression (except at zeta zeros)
How do cancel the Euler products? Seems like you only got the $\Gamma$ factor. |

Jun 19 |
comment |
Complex zeros of $\zeta'(s)/\zeta(s) + \zeta'(1-s)/\zeta(1-s) $ = simpler expression (except at zeta zeros)
$\xi(s) = \xi(1-s)$, isn't it? What is your definition of $\xi$? |