|
5 | added 4 characters in body | ||
|
Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is not properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$. Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres? |
||||
|
|
4 | added 57 characters in body | ||
|
Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. Assume that for any index set $I$, $\cap_{i \in I} K_i$ is not empty and is properly contained in any body $K_i$ for $i\in I$. Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres? |
||||
|
|
3 | deleted 53 characters in body; deleted 27 characters in body | ||
|
Let $K_1, K_2, \ldots K_n$ be convex bodies in $R^d$. (Assume some generality condition, so that in particular, for an any index set $I$, $dim(\cap_{i \cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i)=d-|I|$). Consider an index set $I$, K_i$ is not empty. Is it true that $\cap_{i \in I} \partial K_i$ is a disjoint union of topological (or even better PL) spheres? |
||||
|
2 |
edited title
|
||
|
|
1 |
|
||
