There are many characterizations of Banach spaces that embed isometrically into $L_1$. See
for the classical results. Lindenstrauss and Pelczynski gave another useful one in their "Absolutely summing operators..." paper; namely, whenever $\sum |x^*(x_n)| \le \sum |x^*(y_n)|$, then $\sum \|x_n\| \le C \sum \|y_n\|$ where $C=1$. The main reason this is useful is that if you have the condition for some $C$, then the space $C$-embeds into $L_1$.
One quite remarkable fact (due to Lindenstrauss) is that every two dimensional Banach space embeds isometrically into $L_1$.
Greg, not surprisingly, gives the convex geometry way of looking at subspaces of $\ell_1$, L_1$, while the computer scientists I know would tell you about cut metrics and try to convince you that the really interesting problem is to understand which discrete metric spaces biLipschitz embed into$L_1$. 1 There are many characterizations of Banach spaces that embed isometrically into$L_1$. See Wells, J. H.; Williams, L. R. Embeddings and extensions in analysis. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 84. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1975 for the classical results. Lindenstrauss and Pelczynski gave another useful one in their "Absolutely summing operators..." paper; namely, whenever$\sum |x^*(x_n)| \le \sum |x^*(y_n)| $, then$\sum \|x_n\| \le C \sum \|y_n\| $where$C=1$. The main reason this is useful is that if you have the condition for some$C$, then the space$C$-embeds into$L_1$. One quite remarkable fact (due to Lindenstrauss) is that every two dimensional Banach space embeds isometrically into$L_1$. Greg, not surprisingly, gives the convex geometry way of looking at subspaces of$\ell_1$, while the computer scientists I know would tell you about cut metrics and try to convince you that the really interesting problem is to understand which discrete metric spaces biLipschitz embed into$L_1\$.