show/hide this revision's text 2 FIxed garbled TeX output

Another use of embedding a curve into its Jacobian is to apply the `Mordell-Weil Sieve'. Suppose $k = \mathbb Q$ for simplicity and that you don't know a rational point on $X$, but you know a rational divisor (class) $D$ of degree 1 on $X$. Then you can use $D$ to define an embedding $\iota$ of $X$ into its Jacobian $J$. Now assume in addition that $J({\mathbb Q})$ J(\mathbb Q)$ is known explicitly. Then for every prime $p$ (of good reduction, say), you can consider the images of $X({\mathbb F}_p)$X(\mathbb F_p)$ and of $J({\mathbb Q})$J(\mathbb Q)$ in $J({\mathbb F}p)$J(\mathbb F_p)$ (the first under $\iota$, the second by reduction mod $p$). Clearly, $X({\mathbb Q})$X(\mathbb Q)$ has to map into the intersection of these two. Now instead of considering one prime, we can consider all primes in a finite set $S$ and look at the product of $\prod{\iota(X(\mathbb F_p))$ over all $p \in S} \iota(X({\mathbb F}p}))$S$ and the image of $J({\mathbb Q})$ J(\mathbb Q)$ in the product of $\prod{J(\mathbb F_p)$ over all $p \in S} J({\mathbb F}_p)$`S$.

Now for a suitable choice of $S$ it may be the case that the two sets are disjoint, which then proves that $X$ has no rational points. There are good reasons to believe that it is always possible to prove that $X({\mathbb Q})$ is empty in this way (if it is empty). See this paper.

show/hide this revision's text 1

Another use of embedding a curve into its Jacobian is to apply the Mordell-Weil Sieve'. Suppose $k = \mathbb Q$ for simplicity and that you don't know a rational point on $X$, but you know a rational divisor (class) $D$ of degree 1 on $X$. Then you can use $D$ to define an embedding $\iota$ of $X$ into its Jacobian $J$. Now assume in addition that $J({\mathbb Q})$ is known explicitly. Then for every prime $p$ (of good reduction, say), you can consider the images of$X({\mathbb F}_p)$and of$J({\mathbb Q})$in$J({\mathbb F}p)$ (the first under $\iota$, the second by reduction mod $p$). Clearly,$X({\mathbb Q})$has to map into the intersection of these two. Now instead of considering one prime, we can consider all primes in a finite set $S$ and look at$\prod{p \in S} \iota(X({\mathbb F}p}))$and the image of $J({\mathbb Q})$ in$\prod{p \in S} J({\mathbb F}_p)$`.

Now for a suitable choice of $S$ it may be the case that the two sets are disjoint, which then proves that $X$ has no rational points. There are good reasons to believe that it is always possible to prove that $X({\mathbb Q})$ is empty in this way (if it is empty). See this paper.