|
2 |
edited tags
|
||
|
Post Made Community Wiki by Anton Geraschenko♦♦
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1 |
|
||
Justifying a theory by a seemingly unrelated exampleHere is a topic in the vein of Describe a topic in one sentence and Fundamental examples : imagine that you are trying to explain and justify a mathematical theory T to a skeptical mathematician who thinks T is just some sort of abstract nonsense for its own sake. The ideal solution consists of a problem P which can be stated and understood without knowing anything about T, but which is difficult (or impossible, even better) to solve without T, and easier (or almost-trivial, even better) to solve with the help of T. What should be avoided is an example where T is "superimposed", e.g. when T is a model for some physical phenomenon, because there is always something arbitrary about the choice of a specific model. A classical example is Galois theory for solving polynomial equations. Any examples for homological algebra ? For Fourier analysis ? For category theory ?
|
||||

