MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
show/hide this revision's text 4 edited tags
show/hide this revision's text 3 deleted 60 characters in body; edited tags

Let $\Gamma$ be one of the classical congruence subgroups $\Gamma_0(N)$, $\Gamma_1(N)$ and $\Gamma(N)$ of $SL(2, \mathbb{Z})$.

How does the lower bound for the length of primitive geodesics on $\Gamma \backslash \mathbb{H}$ depending on $N \rightarrow \infty$?

Any suggestions?Please also provide either a reference or a short argument.

show/hide this revision's text 2 added 9 characters in body

Let $\Gamma$ be one of the classical congruence subgroups $\Gamma_0(N)$, $\Gamma_1(N)$ and $\Gamma(N)$ of $SL(2, \mathbb{Z})$.

How does the lower bound for the length of primitive geodesics on $\Gamma \backslash \mathbb{H}$ depending on $\Gamma$ grow?N \rightarrow \infty$?

Any suggestions? Please also provide either a reference or a short argument.

show/hide this revision's text 1