|
Post Closed as "too localized" by Dan Petersen, Deane Yang, Benjamin Steinberg, Willie Wong, Pietro Majer
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
2 | added 63 characters in body | ||
|
Let $A(z)$ be a compact operator on a Hilbert space, depending on a complex parameter $z$. I want to count the number of points where $1+A(z)$ is not invertible and therefore I want to count zeros of $\det (1+A(z))$. Unfortunately $A(z)$ is not of trace class so the determinant does not make sense. However, for some positive integer power $n$ the operator $A(z)^n$ is of trace class. Can I argue that the points $z$ where $1+A(z)^n$ is not invertible include those where $1+A(z)$ is not invertible? EDIT: I mean $1+(-1)^{n-1}A(z)^n$ rather than $1+A(z)^n$. |
||||
|
1 |
|
||
1+A not invertible implies 1+A^n not invertible?Let $A(z)$ be a compact operator on a Hilbert space, depending on a complex parameter $z$. I want to count the number of points where $1+A(z)$ is not invertible and therefore I want to count zeros of $\det (1+A(z))$. Unfortunately $A(z)$ is not of trace class so the determinant does not make sense. However, for some positive integer power $n$ the operator $A(z)^n$ is of trace class. Can I argue that the points $z$ where $1+A(z)^n$ is not invertible include those where $1+A(z)$ is not invertible?
|
||||

