show/hide this revision's text 2 change emphasis

As far as I can tell, the max cut and min cut problems seem to have different inputs: max cut enumerates over all partitions of the vertex set into two subsets, while min cut has a specified source and sink.

Also, if

If you try to take the complement of the edge set to translate a max cut problem, you end up not minimizing cuts, but cuts plus minus a constant correction factor that depends on the size of the subsets in the partition (namely, it is the product of the sizes). This changes the nature of the problem considerably - if you have a dense graph, min cut will tend to separate a small chunk, while the corrected version will not.

Edit: A previous version complained about a difference in input type, hence David's comment.

show/hide this revision's text 1

As far as I can tell, the max cut and min cut problems seem to have different inputs: max cut enumerates over all partitions of the vertex set into two subsets, while min cut has a specified source and sink.

Also, if you try to take the complement of the edge set to translate a max cut problem, you end up not minimizing cuts, but cuts plus a constant that depends on the size of the subsets in the partition.