|
2 |
edited tags; edited title
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
1 |
|
||
On a result of genus two pencilsI am reading the paper "Canonical models of surfaces of general type" by E. Bombieri. In the last section of this paper, there is a statement saying that surfaces with $K^2=1$ and $p_g=0$ do not have pencils of genus $2$, and there is no proof. Is there a proof of this statement?
|
||||
