|
5 |
edited title
|
||
Rokhlin lemma for arbitrary infinite gorupsgroups. |
||||
|
4 | deleted 2 characters in body; edited title | ||
almost fundamental domains Rokhlin lemma for arbitrary infinite groupsgorups.Let $G$ be an at most countable discrete group acting freely on a standard probability measure space $X$ in a measure preserving way. It is well known that if $G$ is a finite group then this action admits a fundamental domain. As pointed out by Andreas below, by Rokhlin lemma, if $G$ contains an element of infinite order we can find an $(\varepsilon, N)$-fundamentalish domain $U$, where the latter is defined as follows: Call a set $U\subset X$ an $(\varepsilon, N)$-fundamentalish domain iff there exist $N$ elements $g_1, \ldots, g_N$ of $G$ such that the sets $g_i(U)$ are pairwise disjoint and the measure of their union is at least $1-\varepsilon$.
Question 2 boils down to $G=\mathbb Z$. I'm particularly interested in Bernoulli shifts. For example when the action is profinite and "transitive on each level", then clearly answer to Question 1 is positive: there exist $(0,N)$-fundamentalish domains for arbitrary large $N$. |
||||
|
3 | typo | ||
|
Let $G$ be a an at most countable discrete group acting freely on a standard probability measure space $X$ in a measure preserving way. It is well known that if $G$ is a finite group then this action admits a fundamental domain. Call a set $U\subset X$ an $(\varepsilon, N)$-fundamentalish domain iff there exist $N$ elements $g_1, \ldots, g_N$ of $G$ such that the sets $g_i(U)$ are pairwise disjoint and the measure of their union is at least $1-\varepsilon$.
Question 2 boils down to $G=\mathbb Z$. I'm particularly interested in Bernoulli shifts. For example when the action is profinite and "transitive on each level", then clearly answer to Question 1 is positive: there exist $(0,N)$-fundamentalish domains for arbitrary large $N$. |
||||
|
2 | added 3 characters in body | ||
|
1 |
|
||

