|
2 |
removed math-ed tag
|
||
|
Post Closed as "off topic" by quid, Pete L. Clark, Qiaochu Yuan, Andy Putman, Felipe Voloch
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1 |
|
||
Historical basis and mathematical significance of Riemann surfacesIt is written in Riemann Surfaces (Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics) by Simon Donaldson, that: "[t]he theory of Riemann surfaces occupies a very special place in mathematics. It is a culmination of much of traditional calculus" Can someone please provide an articulated commentary on this statement. Specifically, the statement suggests, [or seems to suggest], that Riemann surfaces were the logical / mathematical outcome of many years of careful development and refinement of traditional calculus. But: (i) what was / were the major milestones(s) in this road? and (ii) when the author uses the word 'culmination' what specifically is it the culmination of, and what problems / issues did the introduction of Riemann surfaces help to solve / clarify / etc.? (This question was originally posted on Math SE, but I'm also posting it here because I'm seeking an expert's [in Riemann surface theory] feedback if possible.)
|
||||

