show/hide this revision's text 3 w changed to u to be closer to question.

This may not be what you seek, but in the 1996 paper, "Anisotropic refinement algorithms for finite elements" by Goodman, Samuelsson, and Szepessy (.ps link), they show an example of a function $w(x,y)=\frac{1}{2} u(x,y)=\frac{1}{2} y^2$, independent of $x$, which solves $\Delta w u = 1$ on $\mathbb{R}^2$. But with the triangulation shown below, with $\delta \ll \epsilon$, as $\delta \rightarrow 0$, the finite element equation approximates $\Delta w u = 0$ instead of $\Delta w u = 1$.
      Nonconvergence

show/hide this revision's text 2 added 28 characters in body; edited body

This may not be what you seek, but in the 1996 paper, "Anisotropic refinement algorithms for finite elements" by Goodman, Samuelsson, and Szepessy (.ps link), they show an example of a function $w(x,y)=\frac{1}{2} y^2$, independent of $x$, which solves $\Delta w = 1$ on $\mathbb{R}^2$. But with the triangulation shown below, with $\delta \ll \epsilon$, as $\delta \rightarrow 0$, the finite element equation approximates $\Delta w = 0$ instead of $\Delta w = 1$.
      Nonconvergence

show/hide this revision's text 1

This may not be what you seek, but in the 1996 paper, "Anisotropic refinement algorithms for finite elements" by Goodman, Samuelsson, and Szepessy (.ps link), they show an example of a function $w(x,y)=\frac{1}{2} y^2$, independent of $x$, which solves $\Delta w = 1$ on $\mathbb{R}^2$. But with the triangulation shown below, as $\delta \rightarrow 0$, the finite element equation approximates $\Delta w = 0$ instead of $\Delta w = 1$.
      Nonconvergence