|
Post Undeleted by Isac Hedén
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
2 | added 279 characters in body | ||
|
So I've been asking around a little, and nobody seems to be able to tell whether or not Russell's hypersurface is analytically $\mathbb C^3$. Adrien Dubouloz shows in this article that the Makar-Limanov invariant of its product with $\mathbb C$ is where you should put all your welcome upvotestrivial. Thanks!Maybe that helps. |
||||
|
Post Deleted by Isac Hedén
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
1 |
|
||

