|
3 | added 158 characters in body | ||
|
Diaconis and Efron wrote a paper "Testing for Independence in a Two-Way Table: New Interpretations of the Chi-Square Statistic" that was followed by 10 papers discussing their suggestion. The following is from Diaconis and Efron's rejoiner:
The critical paper that they refer to starts with a speldid colorful language:
Update: This is an additional answer too good to be missed.
textarea |
||||
|
|
2 | deleted 29 characters in body | ||
|
This is from a paper of Diaconis and Efron . They wrote a paper "Testing for Independence in a Two-Way Table: New Interpretations of the Chi-Square Statistic" that was followed by 10 papers discussing their suggestion. The following is from Diaconis and Efron's rejoiner:
The critical paper that they refer to starts with a speldid colorful language:
|
||||
|
|
1 | [made Community Wiki] | ||
|
This is from a paper of Diaconis and Efron. They wrote a paper "Testing for Independence in a Two-Way Table: New Interpretations of the Chi-Square Statistic" that was followed by 10 papers discussing their suggestion. The following is from Diaconis and Efron's rejoiner:
The critical paper that they refer to starts with a speldid colorful language:
|
||||
