show/hide this revision's text 2 "fixed" diagram

A math paper should follow all the usual rules of grammar, so in particular there should be subjects and verbs and the sort of punctuation you'd expect to find in a piece of nontechnical writing. I would prefer to write the following:

The formula for a circle is $$ x^2+y^2=r^2. $$

If I had to use the wording in the original question, I would write

This is the formula for a circle: $$ x^2+y^2=r^2. $$

Occasionally, the aesthetics of the page make punctuation look awkward. For example, one might write:

Therefore, the following diagram commutes: $$

M×N -> MRN
   \    xymatrix{M\times N\ar[r]\ar[dr] & M\otimes_R N\ar[d] |
    \   & |
     \  | 
      v v
       A
} $$

with no punctuation after the diagram. There isn't any sensible location for a period at the end of a sentence, so I'd leave it out.

show/hide this revision's text 1 [made Community Wiki]

A math paper should follow all the usual rules of grammar, so in particular there should be subjects and verbs and the sort of punctuation you'd expect to find in a piece of nontechnical writing. I would prefer to write the following:

The formula for a circle is $$ x^2+y^2=r^2. $$

If I had to use the wording in the original question, I would write

This is the formula for a circle: $$ x^2+y^2=r^2. $$

Occasionally, the aesthetics of the page make punctuation look awkward. For example, one might write:

Therefore, the following diagram commutes: $$ \xymatrix{M\times N\ar[r]\ar[dr] & M\otimes_R N\ar[d] \ & A} $$

with no punctuation after the diagram. There isn't any sensible location for a period at the end of a sentence, so I'd leave it out.